Difference between revisions of ".Njcz.NDgwNw"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "�")
 
m (Protected ".Njcz.NDgwNw" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
+
Maine, District Court, September Term, 1808.
 +
United States [?] vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport
 +
Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license
 +
 
 +
After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the Schooner Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - & thereupon decrees, that the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge & permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be considered as ballast & stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.
 +
 
 +
The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on board the Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.
 +
 
 +
Lib [?] Costs.
 +
 
 +
A  Libel, & c. ______________ 6.
 +
    Monition _______________ 1.
 +
M. Service ________________10.
 +
    Entry  __________________ 3.
 +
    Drawing the decree ________1.50
 +
    Filing papers ____________ .42
 +
A Attys attendance + travel ____1.25
 +
M. Proclamation _____________.15
 +
    Copy hereof _____________ .20
 +
 
 +
$ 23.52
 +
 
 +
Examined & allowed by David Sewall, Judge.
 +
A truly copy as of record
 +
Att. H Sewall
 +
 
 +
added.
 +
M. Custody fees ___________ 10.
 +
Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75
 +
Court of seizure ____________ 10.50
 +
Storage of Beef _____________ 1.32
 +
Dockage __________________ 11.50
 +
 
 +
$70 59

Latest revision as of 17:35, 28 December 2017

Maine, District Court, September Term, 1808. United States [?] vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license

After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the Schooner Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - & thereupon decrees, that the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge & permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be considered as ballast & stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.

The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on board the Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.

Lib [?] Costs.

A Libel, & c. ______________ 6.

   Monition _______________ 1.

M. Service ________________10.

   Entry  __________________ 3.
   Drawing the decree ________1.50
   Filing papers ____________ .42

A Attys attendance + travel ____1.25 M. Proclamation _____________.15

    Copy hereof _____________ .20

$ 23.52

Examined & allowed by David Sewall, Judge. A truly copy as of record Att. H Sewall

added. M. Custody fees ___________ 10. Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75 Court of seizure ____________ 10.50 Storage of Beef _____________ 1.32 Dockage __________________ 11.50

$70 59