Difference between revisions of ".Njcz.NDgwNw"

Latest revision as of 17:35, 28 December 2017

Maine, District Court, September Term, 1808. United States [?] vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license

After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the Schooner Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - & thereupon decrees, that the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge & permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be considered as ballast & stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.

The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on board the Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.

Lib [?] Costs.

A Libel, & c. ______________ 6.

   Monition _______________ 1.

M. Service ________________10.

   Entry  __________________ 3.
   Drawing the decree ________1.50
   Filing papers ____________ .42

A Attys attendance + travel ____1.25 M. Proclamation _____________.15

    Copy hereof _____________ .20

$ 23.52

Examined & allowed by David Sewall, Judge. A truly copy as of record Att. H Sewall

added. M. Custody fees ___________ 10. Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75 Court of seizure ____________ 10.50 Storage of Beef _____________ 1.32 Dockage __________________ 11.50

$70 59

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-�Maine Ss. District Court, September Term, 1808.
+Maine, District Court, September Term, 1808.
-United States Lib.ts vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport
+United States [?] vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport
 Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license
-After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the [symbol] Schooner
+After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the Schooner Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - & thereupon decrees, that the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge & permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be considered as ballast & stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.
-Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - + thereupon decrees, that
-the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge
-+ permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be
-considered as ballast + stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.
-The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on
-board to s. Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.
-Lib. ty Costs.
+The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on board the Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.
+Lib [?] Costs.
+A  Libel, & c. ______________ 6.
+    Monition _______________ 1.
+M. Service ________________10.
+    Entry  __________________ 3.
+    Drawing the decree ________1.50
+    Filing papers ____________ .42
+A Attys attendance + travel ____1.25
+M. Proclamation _____________.15
+     Copy hereof _____________ .20
-A Libel, +c. [line] 6.
-v Monition [line] 1.
-M. Service [line] 10.
-v Entry [line] 3.
-v Drawing the decree [line] 1.50
-v Filing papers [line] .42
-A Attys attendance + travel [line] 1.25
-M. Proclamation [line] .15
-v Copy hereof [line] .20
-[line]
 $ 23.52
-Examined + allowed by David Sewall, Judge.
-A truly copy as of record [in red ink]
+Examined & allowed by David Sewall, Judge.
-Att. H Sewell es [in red ink]
+A truly copy as of record
-added. [underlined]
+Att. H Sewall
-M. Custody fees [line] 10.
+added.
+M. Custody fees ___________ 10.
 Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75
-Court of seizure [line] 10.50
+Court of seizure ____________ 10.50
-Storage of Beef [line] 1.32
+Storage of Beef _____________ 1.32
-Dockage [line] 11.50
+Dockage __________________ 11.50
-[line]
 $70 59