Difference between revisions of ".MTMxNQ.NjQxMg"

Latest revision as of 13:55, 30 November 2018

of these seen by Gosnold and which gave the name to the island. The voyages of the norsemen make as much impression on me as a London Fog. They may have got as far as Newfound Land.

Again the Saco River. Of course Sawahcatuk was applied to a limited area-the place where the great river has its outlet. But the river itself must have had a name. The French called it Chouacoet

This seems to have been omitted in the shuffle so I send it in separate container.

Adding an old clipping from a collection of notes on the Language by a member of the Profession.

-- [dash separating a section below]

On second examination I find that I did not make a division of my letter after all.

Nov. 16

A friend of mind from Saco calling here to-day says there is no island at the mouth of the River as shown on the Champlain map. It is therefore proper to consider it as existent when Lo- gave the place a name.

Need not return the enclosure. He was a Yarmouth Me doctor, I believe and worked round the Abnaki etymology in the good old way of Ballard et al.

Yours sincerely Charles E. Banks

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-�of those seen by Gosnold and which gave the name to the claim.  The voyages of the norsemen make as much impression on me as a London Fog.  They may have got as far as Newfoundland.
+of these seen by Gosnold and which gave the name to the island.  The voyages of the norsemen make as much impression on me as a London Fog.  They may have got as far as Newfound Land.
-Again the Saco River.  Of course [?] was applied to a limited area-the place where the great river has its outlet.  But the river itself must have had a name.  The French called it Chouacoet [? - may be Chouacoit - both show up in Google].
+Again the Saco River.  Of course Sawahcatuk was applied to a limited area-the place where the great river has its outlet.  But the river itself must have had a name. The French called it Chouacoet
+This seems to have been omitted in the shuffle so I send it in separate container.
+Adding an old clipping from a collection of notes on the Language by a member of the Profession.
+-- [dash separating a section below]
-There seems to have been omitted [?] the shuffle so I used it [?] separate containers.
-Adding an old [?] from a collection of notes on the language by a member of the Professors.
 On second examination I find that I did not make a division of my letter after all.
 Nov. 16
-A friend of mind from Saco calling here to-day says there is no island at the mouth of the river as shown on the Champlain map.  It is therefore proper to consider it as [?] when [?] gave the place a name.
-Need not return the enclosure.  The was a Yarmouth Me doctor, I believe and worked round the Abanaki [?] on the good old way of Ballard et al.
+A friend of mind from Saco calling here to-day says there is no island at the mouth of the River as shown on the Champlain map. It is therefore proper to consider it as existent when Lo- gave the place a name.
+Need not return the enclosure.  He was a Yarmouth Me doctor, I believe and worked round the Abnaki etymology in the good old way of Ballard et al.
 Yours sincerely
-C.E. Banks
+Charles E. Banks