Difference between revisions of ".MTE3Mw.NTcyNg"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
�           
+
[Penciled at top of page:]  2  Foote [the latter partly obscured]           
  
 
Wiscasset Nov. 16.1820
 
Wiscasset Nov. 16.1820
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Dear Sir
 
Dear Sir
  
Yours of the [11th?] was recd. & you will see it had due attention -  I  
+
Yours of the 14th was recd. & you will see it have due attention -  I  
took the liberty to vary a little, which it is hoped be [?] approved --
+
took the liberty to vary a little, which it is hoped is approved -
  
If any thing further strikes you as proper & [ n---?--y] to be done in this business, please to say and I will see it done --
+
If any thing further strikes you as proper & necessary to be done in this business, please to say and I will see it done -
  
The practise of having Justices of the Peace through the State, appears to be recognised by the Constitution of Massachusetts -- Chap r 6 art 2 0 [underlined]--  but not by our Constitution, except by inference [underlined] --
+
The practice of having Justices of the Peace through the State, appears to be recognised by the Constitution of Massachusetts - Chap.r 6 Art 2 0 [four underlined] -  but not by our Constitution, except by inference [one underlined] -
  
The tenure however, that all commissioned officers have by virtue of the Commission, being expressed therein, I am inclined to the opinion that it is a matter of discretion & expediency with the Governor whether to appoint any Justice of the Peace through the State -You will see by the Resolve of our Legislature that the votes for Electors be returned, on or before [underlined] the 20th of Nov r. & are to be examined [?] by the Governor & Council --
+
The tenure however, that all Commissioned Officers have by virtue of the Commission, being expressed therein, I am inclined to the opinion that it is a matter of discretion & expediency with the Governor, whether to appoint any Justices of the Peace through the State -
 +
 
 +
You will see by the Resolve of our Legislature that the votes for Electors be returned, on or before [three underlined] the 20.th of Nov.r & are to be examined by the Governor & Council -
  
 
The Towns to be heard from in this District are Vinalhaven & Deer Isle - as the votes now stand Mr. Hill is elected by 57.
 
The Towns to be heard from in this District are Vinalhaven & Deer Isle - as the votes now stand Mr. Hill is elected by 57.
  
Yours truly, E. Foote
+
Yours truly E. Foote

Latest revision as of 19:45, 9 February 2022

[Penciled at top of page:] 2 Foote [the latter partly obscured]

Wiscasset Nov. 16.1820

Dear Sir

Yours of the 14th was recd. & you will see it have due attention - I took the liberty to vary a little, which it is hoped is approved -

If any thing further strikes you as proper & necessary to be done in this business, please to say and I will see it done -

The practice of having Justices of the Peace through the State, appears to be recognised by the Constitution of Massachusetts - Chap.r 6 Art 2 0 [four underlined] - but not by our Constitution, except by inference [one underlined] -

The tenure however, that all Commissioned Officers have by virtue of the Commission, being expressed therein, I am inclined to the opinion that it is a matter of discretion & expediency with the Governor, whether to appoint any Justices of the Peace through the State -

You will see by the Resolve of our Legislature that the votes for Electors be returned, on or before [three underlined] the 20.th of Nov.r & are to be examined by the Governor & Council -

The Towns to be heard from in this District are Vinalhaven & Deer Isle - as the votes now stand Mr. Hill is elected by 57.

Yours truly E. Foote