Difference between revisions of ".MTUwNw.MTA3Nzk"
(Created page with "�") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | 314 | |
| + | |||
| + | Resolve, reported by the joint Committee who had under consideration the subject of providing for the compensation of Daniel Rose & Nicholas Emery Esqrs. for services performed for the State, having had two several readings passed to be engrossed as taken into a new draft. Sent down for concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Bill entitled "An Act to abolish the Circuit Court of Common Pleas, transfer the powers thereof to the Supreme Judicial Court and to establish nisi prius, and Law Terms to be holden by the Supreme Judicial Court" as taken in to a new draft entitled "an Act to abolish the Circuit Court of Common Pleas, and to establish a Court of Common Pleas for the State", passed by the Senate on the twenty first day of February instant and sent down for concurrence, came up the House non-concurring, and insisting on their former vote passing the original bill to be engrossed. Nineteen Senators being present, and the question being put on the Senate'ss adhering to their vote by which they passed the bill to be engrossed as taken into a new draft, the ayes were fourteen and the noes four: | ||
Revision as of 14:57, 22 August 2019
314
Resolve, reported by the joint Committee who had under consideration the subject of providing for the compensation of Daniel Rose & Nicholas Emery Esqrs. for services performed for the State, having had two several readings passed to be engrossed as taken into a new draft. Sent down for concurrence.
The Bill entitled "An Act to abolish the Circuit Court of Common Pleas, transfer the powers thereof to the Supreme Judicial Court and to establish nisi prius, and Law Terms to be holden by the Supreme Judicial Court" as taken in to a new draft entitled "an Act to abolish the Circuit Court of Common Pleas, and to establish a Court of Common Pleas for the State", passed by the Senate on the twenty first day of February instant and sent down for concurrence, came up the House non-concurring, and insisting on their former vote passing the original bill to be engrossed. Nineteen Senators being present, and the question being put on the Senate'ss adhering to their vote by which they passed the bill to be engrossed as taken into a new draft, the ayes were fourteen and the noes four: