Difference between revisions of ".MTUzNA.MTYxMDE"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) |
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) m (Protected ".MTUzNA.MTYxMDE" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 18:20, 27 May 2020
21.
[Same]
Petitions of Proprs of Mill dams in Union for a repeal of Fish Laws in Lincoln - of Selectmen of Ellsworth for a repeal of fish laws in Union River & bay - of Assessors of plan. No. 14. for a repeal of same - were read & referred to the committee on Interior fisheries. Sent up for concurrence.
[Same.]
Petitions of Inh. of Clinton to make valid the records of said town - of Selectmen of Corinna to make valid the doings of said town - of Ripley that their proceedings may be made legal - of St Albans to make valid their doings - of Whitfield [Whitefield] to have the proceedings of said town made valid - were read & referred to the committee on New trials - Sent up for concurrence.
Adjourned.
Attest
James L Child
Clerk.