Difference between revisions of ".MTUzNA.MTYwMjk"
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[Remonstrance] | [Remonstrance] | ||
− | Remonstrance of James Osgood agst the petition of | + | Remonstrance of James Osgood agst the petition of Frederic Howard & als, came from the Senate referred to the committee on Turnpikes, Bridges & Canals. Sent up for concurrence. |
[Report - Hosea Rich & al] | [Report - Hosea Rich & al] | ||
− | Report on petition of | + | Report on petition of Hosea Rich & al of Penobscot, that it is inexpedient further to consider the subject, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence & the House concurred. |
[Committee - Probate Laws] | [Committee - Probate Laws] | ||
− | Ordered that the committee on New | + | Ordered that the committee on New trials be instructed to enquire if any, & what alterations or amendments are necessary to be made in the Probate laws of this State - read & passed. Sent up for concurrence. |
− | [Committee Sessions York County] | + | [Committee - Sessions York County] |
− | Ordered that | + | Ordered that Messrs Sands, Wood & Chase of Kittery be a committee to consider the expediency of altering the terms of the Court of Sessions in the County of York - read & passed. |
[Committee - people to say where seat of Government shall be permanently settled -] | [Committee - people to say where seat of Government shall be permanently settled -] | ||
− | Ordered, that | + | Ordered, that Messrs Smith, Clark of Strong, Hopkinson, Sturdivant, Dunn of Poland, Coolidge, Hatch, Weeks, Stone, Parker, Crosby & Fletcher & Adams of Cherryfield be a committee to consider the expediency of submitting to the people of this State the question whether the public interest would be promoted by fixing on a permanent seat of government for this State at the present time - read & passed. |
[Petition] | [Petition] | ||
Petition of William Thomas of Prospect to be divorced from his wife - was read & referred to the committee on new trials. Sent up for concurrence. | Petition of William Thomas of Prospect to be divorced from his wife - was read & referred to the committee on new trials. Sent up for concurrence. |
Revision as of 12:02, 18 June 2020
120
Wednesday February 4th 1824
Met according to adjournment
[Bill - fine towns not Represented]
Ordered that the Senate be requested to send down the Bill imposing a fine on towns entitled, who refuse to send Representative, on their last years files. read & passed.
[Remonstrance]
Remonstrance of James Osgood agst the petition of Frederic Howard & als, came from the Senate referred to the committee on Turnpikes, Bridges & Canals. Sent up for concurrence.
[Report - Hosea Rich & al]
Report on petition of Hosea Rich & al of Penobscot, that it is inexpedient further to consider the subject, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence & the House concurred.
[Committee - Probate Laws]
Ordered that the committee on New trials be instructed to enquire if any, & what alterations or amendments are necessary to be made in the Probate laws of this State - read & passed. Sent up for concurrence.
[Committee - Sessions York County]
Ordered that Messrs Sands, Wood & Chase of Kittery be a committee to consider the expediency of altering the terms of the Court of Sessions in the County of York - read & passed.
[Committee - people to say where seat of Government shall be permanently settled -]
Ordered, that Messrs Smith, Clark of Strong, Hopkinson, Sturdivant, Dunn of Poland, Coolidge, Hatch, Weeks, Stone, Parker, Crosby & Fletcher & Adams of Cherryfield be a committee to consider the expediency of submitting to the people of this State the question whether the public interest would be promoted by fixing on a permanent seat of government for this State at the present time - read & passed.
[Petition]
Petition of William Thomas of Prospect to be divorced from his wife - was read & referred to the committee on new trials. Sent up for concurrence.