Difference between revisions of ".MjEwMw.MjcxNDI"
(Created page with "86 Mr Emmons from the Committee on the Judiciary to which were referred the petition of Selectmen of Goldborough Ellsworth Eden Aurora Waltham Amherst Hancock and Mt Desert pr...") |
m (Protected ".MjEwMw.MjcxNDI" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
86 | 86 | ||
| − | Mr Emmons from the Committee on the Judiciary to which were referred the petition of Selectmen of Goldborough | + | Mr Emmons from the Committee on the Judiciary to which were referred the petition of Selectmen of Goldborough, |
| − | Ellsworth | + | " " Ellsworth, |
| − | Eden | + | " " Eden, |
| − | Aurora | + | " " Aurora, |
| − | Waltham | + | " " Waltham, |
| − | Amherst | + | " " Amherst, |
| − | Hancock and | + | " " Hancock and |
| − | Mt Desert praying for removal of the Shiretown of the County of Hancock from Castine to Ellsworth; also the remonstrance thereto from Sullivan | + | " " Mt Desert praying for removal of the Shiretown of the County of Hancock from Castine to Ellsworth; also the remonstrance thereto from Sullivan & from Bluehill, made a report asking to be discharged from the further consideration thereof and recommending the reference of the same to the Joint Standing Committee on the Division of Alteration of Counties - read and accepted |
| − | + | Sent down for concurrence. Concurred | |
| − | Remonstrance of the Selectmen of Frankfort against the petition of Samuel Crockett came up from the House of Representatives referred to the Committee on Divisions of Towns | + | Remonstrance of the Selectmen of Frankfort against the petition of Samuel Crockett came up from the House of Representatives referred to the Committee on Divisions of Towns. |
| − | + | The Senate nonconcur the House in said reference, and on motion of Mr O'Brien, order the same to be filed with the report on petition of said Crockett. Sent down for concurrence. Concurred. | |
| − | Petition of the town of Surry for the removal of the | + | Petition of the town of Surry for the removal of the Shire town of the County of Hancock from Castine to Ellsworth, laid on the table on Thursday last, was taken up. The Senate recede from their vote of the 21st instant, and refer said petition to the Committee on Division and Alteration of Counties. |
Latest revision as of 16:29, 13 July 2021
86 Mr Emmons from the Committee on the Judiciary to which were referred the petition of Selectmen of Goldborough, " " Ellsworth, " " Eden, " " Aurora, " " Waltham, " " Amherst, " " Hancock and " " Mt Desert praying for removal of the Shiretown of the County of Hancock from Castine to Ellsworth; also the remonstrance thereto from Sullivan & from Bluehill, made a report asking to be discharged from the further consideration thereof and recommending the reference of the same to the Joint Standing Committee on the Division of Alteration of Counties - read and accepted Sent down for concurrence. Concurred
Remonstrance of the Selectmen of Frankfort against the petition of Samuel Crockett came up from the House of Representatives referred to the Committee on Divisions of Towns. The Senate nonconcur the House in said reference, and on motion of Mr O'Brien, order the same to be filed with the report on petition of said Crockett. Sent down for concurrence. Concurred.
Petition of the town of Surry for the removal of the Shire town of the County of Hancock from Castine to Ellsworth, laid on the table on Thursday last, was taken up. The Senate recede from their vote of the 21st instant, and refer said petition to the Committee on Division and Alteration of Counties.