Difference between revisions of ".Njcz.NDgwNw"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "�")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
+
�Maine Ss. District Court, September Term, 1808.
 +
United States Lib.ts vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport
 +
Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license
 +
 
 +
After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the [symbol] Schooner
 +
Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - + thereupon decrees, that
 +
the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge
 +
+ permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be
 +
considered as ballast + stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant.
 +
The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on
 +
board to s. Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.
 +
 
 +
Lib. ty Costs.
 +
 
 +
A Libel, +c. [line] 6.
 +
v Monition [line] 1.
 +
M. Service [line] 10.
 +
v Entry [line] 3.
 +
v Drawing the decree [line] 1.50
 +
v Filing papers [line] .42
 +
A Attys attendance + travel [line] 1.25
 +
M. Proclamation [line] .15
 +
v Copy hereof [line] .20
 +
[line]
 +
$ 23.52
 +
Examined + allowed by David Sewall, Judge.
 +
A truly copy as of record [in red ink]
 +
Att. H Sewell es [in red ink]
 +
added. [underlined]
 +
M. Custody fees [line] 10.
 +
Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75
 +
Court of seizure [line] 10.50
 +
Storage of Beef [line] 1.32
 +
Dockage [line] 11.50
 +
[line]
 +
$70 59

Revision as of 20:36, 11 July 2017

�Maine Ss. District Court, September Term, 1808. United States Lib.ts vs Schooner Parrot of Newburyport Seized by the Collector of Penobscot, for depositing without special license

After a hearing -- the Court is of opinion, that the [symbol] Schooner Parrot is not by law liable to confiscation - + thereupon decrees, that the same, together with the few articles taken on board by the knowledge + permission of the Collector of Newburyport (which may with propriety be considered as ballast + stores) be forthwith restored to the claimant. The Court is further of opinion from the appearance of the papers on board to s. Schooner, that there was reasonable cause of seizure.

Lib. ty Costs.

A Libel, +c. [line] 6. v Monition [line] 1. M. Service [line] 10. v Entry [line] 3. v Drawing the decree [line] 1.50 v Filing papers [line] .42 A Attys attendance + travel [line] 1.25 M. Proclamation [line] .15 v Copy hereof [line] .20 [line] $ 23.52 Examined + allowed by David Sewall, Judge. A truly copy as of record [in red ink] Att. H Sewell es [in red ink] added. [underlined] M. Custody fees [line] 10. Wm. Pilsbury 100 miles + 3 days attend 12.75 Court of seizure [line] 10.50 Storage of Beef [line] 1.32 Dockage [line] 11.50 [line] $70 59