Difference between revisions of ".ODky.NTE4Ng"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
LindaFreeman (talk | contribs) (Created page with "�") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
� | � | ||
| + | New London now is. Others will occur to you. I | ||
| + | think of others containing the same distinctive idea. | ||
| + | Nobska (woods Hole) and Pe-nobsk-ut (Penobscot.) | ||
| + | One is a river - another a herdland. Why the dif- | ||
| + | ference? Wee have to deal with many sources | ||
| + | of error such as the ignorance of the [?] to | ||
| + | understanding the language of the Indian. | ||
| + | By putting yourself in the shoes of Capt John | ||
| + | Smith, as an example, you can see how difficult | ||
| + | it would be to know [underlined] what a red-skin meant | ||
| + | by a word, or place name, whether it applied | ||
| + | to a limited area or its most prominent attri- | ||
| + | bute. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:18, 5 September 2017
� New London now is. Others will occur to you. I think of others containing the same distinctive idea. Nobska (woods Hole) and Pe-nobsk-ut (Penobscot.) One is a river - another a herdland. Why the dif- ference? Wee have to deal with many sources of error such as the ignorance of the [?] to understanding the language of the Indian. By putting yourself in the shoes of Capt John Smith, as an example, you can see how difficult it would be to know [underlined] what a red-skin meant by a word, or place name, whether it applied to a limited area or its most prominent attri- bute.