Difference between revisions of ".MTMxNQ.NjQxOQ"

Latest revision as of 14:15, 30 November 2018

Boston. July 20. 1931.

My dear Mrs. Eckstorm The old saying that all things come to those who waits is a distinct appeal to laziness. "To him who digs" is my amendment; for the few things I have got by waiting are not to be compared with those I got by perspiring labor.

I refer to your long quest for the correct date of the battle of Pigwacket and miss you are duly impressed with the humbug of the publisher in ducking the Sunday fight. Reminds me of the Battle of Dunbar not fought on Sunday because the Scotch elders would not allow Leslie to attack Cromwell on that day-a perfectly good military principle to strike first with advantage on your side-but allowed time for "Noll" to strengthen his position. Results the "Elders" ran hectic were walloped.

I have two very early forms of Ogunquit, one in 1655 on a mass map. (Bost. Museum) Negunket[underlined] and another about same time as Nagunket[underlined]. This alters the face of the landscape. I seem to see the same root that appears in Machigonne, Mon-Egan, Knapps-Egan (Vineyard) with a lost first syllable-um? mum? Qunquit is a small area between higher land, fit for a corn field.

I am enclosing a French letter from Champigny, [?] of Quebec, 1692, reporting the massacre at York. The part enclosed with a (calling attention to a phrase which stumps me and numerous others- "les comptes aves des pors or poix[underlined]. As a last resort I had gravitated to the idea that pois or poix was a Canadian-French idiom for scalps[underlined] as the Parisian had no expression (as far as I know) for scalping or scalps. Occurred to me to send it to Quebec to the counsel to ask help from some savant there. With the printed proof I send the explanation of Mons. Roy that archivists of the Province. It is in French which perhaps you can digest. But it is to

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-�Boston
+Boston. July 20. 1931.
-July 20, 1931
 My dear Mrs. Eckstorm
 The old saying that all things come to those who waits is a distinct appeal to laziness.  "To him who digs" is my amendment; for the few things I have got by waiting are not to be compared with those I got by perspiring labor.
-I refer to your long quest for the correct date of the battle of [?] [?] you are duly impressed with the [?] of the publisher in ducking the Sunday fight.  Reminds me of the Battle of [?] not fought on Sunday because the Scotch elders would not allow Leslie to attack Cromwell on that day-a perfectly good military [?] to strike first with advantage on your side-but allowed him for "[?]" to strengthen his position.  Results the "Elders" ran hectic were walloped.
+I refer to your long quest for the correct date of the battle of Pigwacket and miss you are duly impressed with the humbug of the publisher in ducking the Sunday fight.  Reminds me of the Battle of Dunbar not fought on Sunday because the Scotch elders would not allow Leslie to attack Cromwell on that day-a perfectly good military principle to strike first with advantage on your side-but allowed time for "Noll" to strengthen his position.  Results the "Elders" ran hectic were walloped.
-I have two very early forms of Ogunquit, one in 1655 on a mass map. (Bost. Museum) Negunket (underscored) and another about same time as Nagunket.  This alters the face of the landscape.  I seem to see the same root that appears in [?], [?], [?] [(?)} writes a lost first syllable-um? mum? Ounquit is a small area between higher [?], fit for a corn field.
+I have two very early forms of Ogunquit, one in 1655 on a mass map. (Bost. Museum) Negunket[underlined] and another about same time as Nagunket[underlined].  This alters the face of the landscape.  I seem to see the same root that appears in Machigonne, Mon-Egan, Knapps-Egan (Vineyard) with a lost first syllable-um? mum? Qunquit is a small area between higher land, fit for a corn field.
-I am enclosing a French letter from Champ[?], [?] of Quebec, 1692, reporting the massacre of York.  The part enclosed with a (calling attention to a phrase which stumps me and numerous others-{"?"].  As a last resort I had gravitated to the idea that pois or poix was a Canadian-French idiom for scalps (scalps is underscored) as the Parisian had no expression (as far as I know) for scalping or scalps.  Occurred to me to send it to Quebec to the counsel to ask [?] help from some savant there.  With the printed page I send the explanation of [?].  Roy that archivists of the Province.  It is in French which perhaps your can digest.  But it is to
+I am enclosing a French letter from Champigny, [?] of Quebec, 1692, reporting the massacre at York.  The part enclosed with a (calling attention to a phrase which stumps me and numerous others- "les comptes aves des pors or poix[underlined].  As a last resort I had gravitated to the idea that pois or poix was a Canadian-French idiom for scalps[underlined] as the Parisian had no expression (as far as I know) for scalping or scalps.  Occurred to me to send it to Quebec to the counsel to ask help from some savant there.  With the printed proof I send the explanation of Mons.  Roy that archivists of the Province.  It is in French which perhaps you can digest.  But it is to