Difference between revisions of ".MTI0OQ.NTk1MA"

Latest revision as of 15:38, 10 August 2018

�447 Marlboro St Dec [?]/30

Dear Mrs. Eckstorm,

I can't think of [?] [?] as anything, but our [?] peninsula word. Here it is [?] [?] mostly as in Shawmut. You get the ending as [?], present Potomac.

Re [?], I [?] have listed [?] [?] forms that are mostly not [?] true words. This is unkindness, for I can't clear them up yet. I've an idea the [?] is valid, the [?] standing for [?] long. And my troubles about the [?] type here lead toward [?] as a boundary term, v. [?], divisions, boundary, fence. The words for beyond also change into boundary terms, and I shouldn't wonder if your [?] [?] + [?] anmes both [?] the other side idea, whether used [?] a boundary [?] or not.

My first look at the [?] [?] + items on the map brought up [?], which [?] thought meanst doubled up, [?] [?] isn't. I don't think the [?] form applies. Then I fully accept the form + meaning Sylvia + Fannie [?]. They were

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-�
+�447 Marlboro St
+Dec [?]/30
+Dear Mrs. Eckstorm,
+I can't think of [?] [?] as anything, but our [?] peninsula word.  Here it is [?] [?] mostly as in Shawmut.  You get the ending as [?], present Potomac.
+Re [?], I [?] have listed [?] [?] forms that are mostly not [?] true words.  This is unkindness, for I can't clear them up yet.  I've an idea the [?] is valid, the [?] standing for [?] long.  And my troubles about the [?] type here lead toward [?] as a boundary term, v. [?], divisions, boundary, fence.  The words for beyond also change into boundary terms, and I shouldn't wonder if your  [?] [?] + [?] anmes both [?] the other side idea, whether used [?] a boundary [?] or not.
+My first look at the [?] [?] + items on the map brought up [?], which [?] thought meanst doubled up, [?] [?] isn't.  I don't think the [?] form applies.  Then I fully accept the form + meaning Sylvia + Fannie [?]. They were