Difference between revisions of ".MjEwNg.MzAxNjM"
(Created page with "[page 795] Q. To whom did you report it? A. To the supervisor, Mr. Hamilton Q. Was that before or after the other case? A. It was at the same time. I reported them both toget...") |
HeatherMoran (talk | contribs) m (Protected ".MjEwNg.MzAxNjM" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
think the officers would allow any such | think the officers would allow any such | ||
thing at the institution. | thing at the institution. | ||
| − | Q. Have you | + | Q. Have you ever heard, during all the time you |
have been there, the term "churning"? | have been there, the term "churning"? | ||
A. Yes, I have. | A. Yes, I have. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:19, 27 July 2022
[page 795] Q. To whom did you report it? A. To the supervisor, Mr. Hamilton Q. Was that before or after the other case? A. It was at the same time. I reported them both together Q. You reported the attendants name with the case did you? A. I did. Q. You dont know what steps Hamilton took about it? A. No sir. Q. Have you any doubt but that if either of these cases had come to the knowledge of the superintendent that the man would have been summarily dealt with? A. I know they would have gone. Q. When you said before that they would have gone " up the lane" you meant discharged? A. Yes, sir; because I dont think the officers would allow any such thing at the institution. Q. Have you ever heard, during all the time you have been there, the term "churning"? A. Yes, I have. Q. Did you ever hear the term mentioned in the presence of any officer of the institution? A. No, sir. Q. No reason to suspect that they ever heard