Difference between revisions of ".MTUzNA.MTYxNDk"

Latest revision as of 20:00, 12 June 2020

79

[Reports]

Reports on petition of George Ulmer - on petition of Town of Milo - on petition of John Deane - on petition of David Bailey - on petition of Inh. of Mattanawcook - on petition of Town of Falmouth - on petition of Alpheus Shaw & al - on petition of Henry Stewart. - granting leave to withdraw, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.

[Reports -]

Reports, on petition of town of Porter - on petition of Ripley - on petition of Corinth - on petition of John Dudley & als - on petition of Martin Sidelinger & al - on petition of Selectmen of Ellsworth - granting an order of notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - & the House concurred.

[Reports -]

Reports, on petition of Rufus Spaulding & als - on petition of Inh. of Sunkhaze plantation - referring the subjects of said petition to the next Legislature came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.

[Augusta Deed - Question]

Mr Williams requested a return of the House to be taken, in order that he might, (if the adequate number of members should be found to be in their seats,) move a reconsideration of the vote passed on 22d inst. referring the subject of the report on the deed of Joshua Gage & als, &c &c - On taking the return it appeared but 135 members were present a less number than when said vote passed. Mr Williams then proposed to the House to waive the rule requiring as many members to be present &c [see Article 3d rule 8.] which the House refused to do. He then gave notice that on

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [Reports]
-Reports on petition of George Ulmer - on petition of Town of Milo - on petition of John Deane - on petition of David Bailey - on petition of Inh. of Mattanawcook - on petition of Town of Falmouth - on petition of Matheus Shaw & al - on petition of Henry Stewart. - granting leave to withdraw, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.
+Reports on petition of George Ulmer
+- on petition of Town of Milo
+- on petition of John Deane
+- on petition of David Bailey
+- on petition of Inh. of Mattanawcook
+- on petition of Town of Falmouth
+- on petition of Alpheus Shaw & al
+- on petition of Henry Stewart. - granting leave to withdraw, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.
 [Reports -]
-Reports, on petition of town of Porter - on petition of Ripley - on petition of Corinth - on petition of John Dudley & als - on petition of Martin Sidelinger & al - on petition of Selectmen of Ellsworth - granting an order of notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - & the House concurred.
+Reports, on petition of town of Porter
+- on petition of Ripley
+- on petition of Corinth
+- on petition of John Dudley & als
+- on petition of Martin Sidelinger & al
+- on petition of Selectmen of Ellsworth - granting an order of notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - & the House concurred.
 [Reports -]
-Reports, on petition of Rufus Spaulding & als - on petition of Inh. of Sunkhage plantation - referring the subjects of said petition to the next Legislature came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.
+Reports, on petition of Rufus Spaulding & als -
+on petition of Inh. of Sunkhaze plantation - referring the subjects of said petition to the next Legislature came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.
-[Augusta Deed - Lewiston]
+[Augusta Deed - Question]
-Mr Williams requested a return of the House to be taken, in order that he might, ( if the adequate numbers of members should be found to be in their seats,) move a reconsideration of the vote passed on 22d inst. referring the subject of the report on the deed of Joshua Gage & als, &c &c - On takeny [?] the return it appeared but 135 members were present a less [?] number than when said vote passed. Mr Williams then proposed to the House to waive the rule requiring as many members to be present &c [see article 3d rule 8.] which the House refused to do. He then gave notice that on
+Mr Williams requested a return of the House to be taken, in order that he might, (if the adequate number of members should be found to be in their seats,) move a reconsideration of the vote passed on 22d inst. referring the subject of the report on the deed of Joshua Gage & als, &c &c - On taking the return it appeared but 135 members were present a less number than when said vote passed. Mr Williams then proposed to the House to waive the rule requiring as many members to be present &c [see Article 3d rule 8.] which the House refused to do. He then gave notice that on