Difference between revisions of ".ODk3.NTIyMw"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected ".ODk3.NTIyMw" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
�abandoned every thing but honor at their country's
+
abandoned everything but honor at their country's
call to be toyed with for a few weeks + sent home
+
call to be toyed with for a few weeks & sent home
for incompetency, arising from the fact of this willfully
+
for incompetency, arising from the fact of their willfully
criminal persistency in being respectingly more than 22
+
criminal persistency in being respectively more than 22
+ 30 Years of age. Now my deal Genl not withstanding
+
& 30 years of age. Now my dear General, not withstanding
yr a very young man yourself, you cannot fine +
+
you are a very young man yourself, you cannot fail to perceive the hobble we are in & ought we not attempt
perceive the hobble we are in + ought we not attempt
+
to procure a modification of this rule?
to procure a modification of this rule!
 
  
I want to write you about various topics
+
I want to write you about various topics fresh in my mind when I commenced, but gone now.  [?] has instructed me to have the 3 Maj Genls staffs paid & discharged next week. This idea is that they must have their monthly pay & voting, but not their allowances.  What do you think of that?
fresh in my mind when I commenced, but you now
+
Will Genl. Government allow it? Will they not
far have instructed me to have the 3 Maj Genes staffs
+
require us to limit those expenses to Maj. Genl. &
paid + discharged next week. This idea is that
+
pay the others as Brigadiers? They did so in the
they must have their monthly pay + voting
+
Aroostook War.  Maj Genl Foster of Calais had 6 companies under his charge 6 weeks & was paid only
 +
as Brig Genl.  But above all this, is the [?]
 +
and the seniors of them Maj. Genls. of the character
 +
in command & in line that they can demand &
 +
receive pay as such Maj. Genls. I should prefer to
 +
have them paid in full, upon the army basis, if
 +
it can be reimbursed us, can it?
 +
 
 +
But I must not stop to write more
 +
 
 +
I remain very truly yrs in haste,
 +
John L. Hodsdon -
 +
Adjutant General

Latest revision as of 14:16, 12 October 2017

abandoned everything but honor at their country's call to be toyed with for a few weeks & sent home for incompetency, arising from the fact of their willfully criminal persistency in being respectively more than 22 & 30 years of age. Now my dear General, not withstanding you are a very young man yourself, you cannot fail to perceive the hobble we are in & ought we not attempt to procure a modification of this rule?

I want to write you about various topics fresh in my mind when I commenced, but gone now. [?] has instructed me to have the 3 Maj Genls staffs paid & discharged next week. This idea is that they must have their monthly pay & voting, but not their allowances. What do you think of that? Will Genl. Government allow it? Will they not require us to limit those expenses to Maj. Genl. & pay the others as Brigadiers? They did so in the Aroostook War. Maj Genl Foster of Calais had 6 companies under his charge 6 weeks & was paid only as Brig Genl. But above all this, is the [?] and the seniors of them Maj. Genls. of the character in command & in line that they can demand & receive pay as such Maj. Genls. I should prefer to have them paid in full, upon the army basis, if it can be reimbursed us, can it?

But I must not stop to write more

I remain very truly yrs in haste, John L. Hodsdon - Adjutant General