Difference between revisions of ".MTUyOQ.MTUxOTE"
(Created page with "�") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | 229 | |
| + | |||
| + | Afternoon. Met according to adjournment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [James M Rogers case - continued -] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The House resumed the consideration of the causes assigned for the removal of James M Rogers &c - And Mr Denlois, Counsel for said Rogers was present. The Managers on the part of the House introduced a copy of the record of the indictment against said Rogers with the proceedings thereon, including the verdict of the Jury and the motion by the Defendant for a new trial. They also introduced a written opinion signed by two of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, that the motion for a new trial could not be sustained. the evidence being gone through on the part of the House, Mr Deblois commented upon the inadequacy of the testimony &c &c and Mr Todd made a short reply. The question was then put by the speaker, "Shall the Address to the Governor for the removal of James M Rogers from all the offices both civil & military which he now holds under the authority of this State", pass and decided in the affirmative 96 pro. 7 con. The address and accompanying documents were then sent up to the Senate for their concurrence. | ||
Revision as of 20:47, 28 April 2020
229
Afternoon. Met according to adjournment.
[James M Rogers case - continued -]
The House resumed the consideration of the causes assigned for the removal of James M Rogers &c - And Mr Denlois, Counsel for said Rogers was present. The Managers on the part of the House introduced a copy of the record of the indictment against said Rogers with the proceedings thereon, including the verdict of the Jury and the motion by the Defendant for a new trial. They also introduced a written opinion signed by two of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, that the motion for a new trial could not be sustained. the evidence being gone through on the part of the House, Mr Deblois commented upon the inadequacy of the testimony &c &c and Mr Todd made a short reply. The question was then put by the speaker, "Shall the Address to the Governor for the removal of James M Rogers from all the offices both civil & military which he now holds under the authority of this State", pass and decided in the affirmative 96 pro. 7 con. The address and accompanying documents were then sent up to the Senate for their concurrence.