Difference between revisions of ".MTUzNw.MTQ3MDQ"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Samuel Butman has 773 and is elected | Samuel Butman has 773 and is elected | ||
| − | The Committee have rejected the votes of the towns of Raymond in the County of Cumberland, Bristol and Patricktown plantation in the County of Lincoln, Sedgewick and Franklin in the County of Hancock, Andover, Dixfield, Greenwood, Sweden and Plantation No. 8 in the County of Oxford, because that the returns from these towns and plantations respectively do not state what number of votes was given for each of the persons voted for. | + | The Committee have rejected the votes of the towns of Raymond in the County of Cumberland, Bristol and Patricktown plantation in the County of Lincoln, Sedgewick and Franklin in the County of Hancock, Andover, Dixfield, Greenwood, Sweden and Plantation No. 8 in the County of Oxford, because that the returns from these towns and plantations respectively do not state what number of votes was given for each of the persons voted for. |
| + | |||
| + | [Report of Committee on Votes for Senators.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | The original return of the votes given for Senators in the town of Topsham in the County of Lincoln has not been delivered to the Secretary of State, but a duplicate list of the votes certified in the form prescribed was received by the Secretary of State on the 3rd December 1825 the Committee have rejected there votes | ||
| + | |||
| + | The votes of the town of Surry in the County of Hancock and Broncoville in the County of Penobscot are rejected for the reason that the Returns are signed by one Selectman only | ||
| + | The votes of the town of Alexander in the County of Washington are rejected because the certificate states that the assessors presided at the meeting, and received, sorted and counted the votes | ||
| + | The votes of the town of Maxfield in the County of Penobscot are rejected, because the list of them returned, is certified by the assessors and not by the Selectmen | ||
| + | The votes of plantation No4 East Side of Penobscot River are rejected, because the Return does not state that the votes were received by the assessors, or who presided at the meeting or that a record of the votes was made. | ||
| + | The votes of the town of | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 5 May 2020
8.
Samuel Butman has 773 and is elected
The Committee have rejected the votes of the towns of Raymond in the County of Cumberland, Bristol and Patricktown plantation in the County of Lincoln, Sedgewick and Franklin in the County of Hancock, Andover, Dixfield, Greenwood, Sweden and Plantation No. 8 in the County of Oxford, because that the returns from these towns and plantations respectively do not state what number of votes was given for each of the persons voted for.
[Report of Committee on Votes for Senators.]
The original return of the votes given for Senators in the town of Topsham in the County of Lincoln has not been delivered to the Secretary of State, but a duplicate list of the votes certified in the form prescribed was received by the Secretary of State on the 3rd December 1825 the Committee have rejected there votes
The votes of the town of Surry in the County of Hancock and Broncoville in the County of Penobscot are rejected for the reason that the Returns are signed by one Selectman only The votes of the town of Alexander in the County of Washington are rejected because the certificate states that the assessors presided at the meeting, and received, sorted and counted the votes The votes of the town of Maxfield in the County of Penobscot are rejected, because the list of them returned, is certified by the assessors and not by the Selectmen The votes of plantation No4 East Side of Penobscot River are rejected, because the Return does not state that the votes were received by the assessors, or who presided at the meeting or that a record of the votes was made. The votes of the town of