Stevenshenriksen7720

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search

Previous evidence suggests that acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with COVID-19 and associated with adverse outcomes. Moreover, the incidence and mortality of AKI in Asia are ambiguous.

Evaluating the risk factors and risk of death from AKI in -COVID-19 patients in Asia.

We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical observational studies of -COVID-19 patients in Asia. Outcome measures included AKI in COVID-19 patients, overall mortality in COVID-19 patients, and mortality assessment in patients with AKI. The random-effects model was adopted, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis.

27 clinical studies (18,216 Asian patients with COVID-19) have been included in the study. The pooled incidence of AKI was 0.19 (95% CI 16-23%; I

=98.9%, p<0.001); the pooled incidence of total mortality was 0.19 (95% CI 17-22%; I

=98.9%, p<0.001). No publication bias was found (Egger's test, p=0.396, 0.213). The pooled mortality in AKI patients with COVID-19 was 50% (95% CI 33-67%; I

by random-effects model =98.4%, p<0.001). AKI was found to be a risk factor for death in stepwise regression analysis; age, diabetes, and hypertension were influencing factors for AKI risk in -COVID-19 patients.

AKI is a common complication in Asian COVID-19 patients, and it is associated with an increase in mortality of Asian COVID-19 patients. Any treatment that protects the kidney may be a practical intervention to reduce the mortality of COVID-19 patients in Asia.

AKI is a common complication in Asian COVID-19 patients, and it is associated with an increase in mortality of Asian COVID-19 patients. Any treatment that protects the kidney may be a practical intervention to reduce the mortality of COVID-19 patients in Asia.

Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with both kidney and respiratory failure. During the early phase of the coronavirus disease pandemic, patients often required the use of mechanical assistance to provide adequate kidney and lung function. In this paper we describe the clinical outcomes of patients who required synchronous kidney and lung extracorporeal support for COVID-19.

All patients admitted to Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, between February 1, 2020, to April 23, 2021, with COVID-19 who required both extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were on hemo- or peritoneal dialysis prior to admission or who required veno-arterial (VA) ECMO were excluded.

35 patients with COVID-19 required ECMO and CRRT support. Four patients (11%) were excluded, 2 due to being on dialysis prior to admission and 2 due to the requirement of VA-ECMO. The median time on CRRT was 33 days (IQR 13-51). The median time on ECMO was 28 days (IQR 10.5-59.5). At 90 days, 9 patients had died (29%), 4 patients remained hospitalized, and 18 patients had been discharged 10 to long-term acute care, 2 to inpatient rehabilitation, and 6 to home.

Patients with severe COVID-19 requiring concurrent ECMO and CRRT in this institution had a 29% mortality at 90 days.

Patients with severe COVID-19 requiring concurrent ECMO and CRRT in this institution had a 29% mortality at 90 days.Vascular calcification (VC) and myocardial hypertrophy are very common in patients on hemodialysis (HD). Previous studies have only assessed the cross-sectional associations of VC with left ventricular mass (LVM) and the predictive value of individual factors. The present study investigated the relationship between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and LVM increment over time, and the combined effect of these factors on the outcomes of HD patients. 104 HD patients were enrolled. AAC scores were evaluated on left lateral lumbar spine radiographs. Echocardiography was performed to calculate the LVM changes during a 2-year period. At baseline, 91 patients (87.5%) had varying degrees of AAC (median score 6.0, range 2.0 - 11.0). After 2 years, the mean LVM change was 7.49 g (range -5.03 - 26.00 g), and 68 patients (65%) had an increased LVM. Patients with higher baseline AAC scores had significantly larger LVM and LVM index increments. Patients with increased LVM had significantly higher baseline AAC scores and hemoglobin, serum phosphate, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels. Multiple stepwise linear regression demonstrated that the baseline AAC was the only independent predictor of increased LVM after 2 years. 28 patients (26.9%) died in the subsequent 5 years. MC3 mouse Patients with lower baseline AAC scores had a significantly higher cumulative survival rate than those with higher AAC scores. However, the LVM change (either alone or in combination with the AAC score) had no significant effect on survival. In conclusion, AAC is an independent predictor of LVM increase over time in HD patients. Prevention and treatment of VC may be a promising intervention target to improve left ventricular remodeling and outcomes in HD patients.

There are multiple risk factors for inflammation in dialysis. One potential cause is the presence of circulating levels of Gram-negative bacteria-derived endotoxin which is a strong inducer of inflammation. Gut-associated endotoxin may enter the circulation via a defective blood-gut barrier during episodes of hypotension or reduced perfusion.

In this study, 165 patients receiving outpatient-based hemodialysis in a facility (FHD) or at home (HHD), were studied. Levels of inflammation were quantified by developing an inflammatory score derived from the measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) variability and hypotension events were recorded. This included the final session of dialysis, at the commencement of which the blood samples were drawn, as well as the five preceding sessions.

The median inflammatory score was 2 (range 0 - 3), and 30% of patients had an inflatoxemia is uncommon and unlikely to be a significant driver of inflammation.

Pre-dialysis levels of inflammation are prevalent in the hemodialysis population after the long break but are not related to intradialytic BP variability or hypotension in the preceding 2 weeks. However, endotoxemia is uncommon and unlikely to be a significant driver of inflammation.Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as the concomitant occurrence of stenosis in at least two or more distinct regions (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) of the spine and may present with a constellation of signs and symptoms. It has four subtypes, including cervico-lumbar, cervico-thoracic, thoraco-lumbar, and cervico-thoraco-lumbar TSS. The prevalence of TSS varies depending on the different subtypes and cohorts. The main aetiologies of TSS are spinal degenerative changes and heterotopic ossification, and patients with developmental spinal stenosis, ligament ossification, and spinal stenosis at any region are at an increased risk of developing TSS. The diagnosis of TSS is challenging. The clinical presentation of TSS could be complex, concealed, or severe, and these features may be confusing to clinicians, resulting in an incomplete or delayed diagnosis. Additionally, a consolidated diagnostic criterion for TSS is urgently required to improve consistency across studies and form a basis for establishing treatment guidelines. The optimal treatment option for TSS is still under debate; areas of controversies include choice of the decompression range, choice between simultaneous or staged surgical patterns, and the order of the surgeries. The present study reviews publications on TSS, consolidates current awareness on prevalence, aetiologies, potential risk factors, diagnostic dilemmas and criteria, and surgical strategies based on TSS subtypes. This is the first review to include thoracic spinal stenosis as a candidate disorder in TSS and aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive overview of TSS.

Diagnostics and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) are highly variable in clinical practice. To obtain more uniform and evidence-based treatment pathways, we developed the 'Dutch guideline for DDH in children < 1 year'. This study describes recommendations for unstable and decentered hips.

The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation criteria (AGREE II) were applied. A systematic literature review was performed for six predefined guideline questions. Recommendations were developed, based on literature findings, as well as harms/benefits, patient/parent preferences, and costs (GRADE).

The systematic literature search resulted in 843 articles and 11 were included. Final guideline recommendations are (i) Pavlik harness is the preferred first step in the treatment of (sub) luxated hips; (ii) follow-up with ultrasound at 3-4 and 6-8 weeks; (iii) if no centered and stable hip after 6-8 weeks is present, closed reduction is indicated; (iv) if reduction is restricted by limited hip abduction, adductor tenotomy is indicated; (v) in case of open reduction, the anterior, anterolateral, or medial approach is advised, with the choice based on surgical preference and experience; (vi) after reduction (closed/open), a spica cast is advised for 12 weeks, followed by an abduction device in case of residual dysplasia.

This study presents recommendations on the treatment of decentered DDH, based on the available literature and expert consensus, as Part 2 of the first official and national evidence-based 'Guideline for DDH in children < 1 year'. Part 1 describes the guideline sections on centered DDH in a separate article.

This study presents recommendations on the treatment of decentered DDH, based on the available literature and expert consensus, as Part 2 of the first official and national evidence-based 'Guideline for DDH in children less then 1 year'. Part 1 describes the guideline sections on centered DDH in a separate article.Open reduction and internal fixation is the gold standard treatment for tibial plateau fractures. However, the procedure is not free of complications such as knee stiffness, acute infection, chronic infection (osteomyelitis), malunion, non-union, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The treatment options for knee stiffness are mobilisation under anaesthesia (MUA) when the duration is less than 3 months, arthroscopic release when the duration is between 3 and 6 months, and open release for refractory cases or cases lasting more than 6 months. Early arthroscopic release can be associated with MUA. Regarding treatment of acute infection, if the fracture has healed, the hardware can be removed, and lavage and debridement can be performed along with antibiotic therapy. If the fracture has not healed, the hardware is retained, and lavage, debridement, and antibiotic therapy are performed (sometimes more than once until the fracture heals). Fracture stability is important not only for healing but also for resolving the infection. In cases of osteomyelitis, treatment should be performed in stages aggressive debridement of devitalised tissue and bone, antibiotic spacing and temporary external fixation until the infection is resolved (first stage), followed by definitive surgery with grafting or soft tissue coverage depending on the bone defect (second stage). Intra-articular or extra-articular osteotomy is a good option to correct malunion in young, active patients without significant joint damage. When malunion is associated with extensive joint involvement or the initial cartilage damage has resulted in knee osteoarthritis, the surgical option is total knee arthroplasty.