User: CindaBorrego89
down site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.
You have to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
Feel free to surf to my webpage - 최신 웹하드