Difference between revisions of ".MjA4NQ.MjU0MDQ"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Bangor, Oct 11 / 62 Bro. Hodsdon - I send the mothers papers for the $5.13 due Warren J. Devereux, late private Co. B 2 Me Regt, he died in prison at Richmond on 4/62 the...")
 
m (Protected ".MjA4NQ.MjU0MDQ" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I send the mothers papers for the $5.13
 
I send the mothers papers for the $5.13
 
due Warren J. Devereux, late private Co. B 2 Me Regt,
 
due Warren J. Devereux, late private Co. B 2 Me Regt,
he died in prison at Richmond on 4/62  the Dr. has
+
he died in prison at Richmond [Jan?] 4/62  Mrs  D. has
 +
rec'd the pay and Bounty Though Bro Abbot [    on]--
 +
it is [right]. I am [not] sorry the rolls show Geo.A.
 +
Devereaux, whose papers you returned to me is not
 +
entitled to the [State] and be to Bounty thought I could
 +
not see how, by his discharge he could be ex-
 +
cluded and really now, I can not think he
 +
brings his case technically within both this letter and
 +
the shield of the law---he did pass the final ordeal
 +
was accepted and mustered into the U S
 +
service--and filled one of [  s] quota--after this
 +
he was taken sick and discharge for the season--
 +
It was a sickness not on him when he [ ed] the
 +
service--it was a new matter--and in the same
 +
so far as his legal rights are concerned a
 +
though it had come on him two years and
 +
ten months after he [ ]. I the service
 +
Is is just so? --Truly yours
 +
C.P. Brown

Latest revision as of 17:32, 28 October 2021

Bangor, Oct 11 / 62

Bro. Hodsdon -

I send the mothers papers for the $5.13 due Warren J. Devereux, late private Co. B 2 Me Regt, he died in prison at Richmond [Jan?] 4/62 Mrs D. has rec'd the pay and Bounty Though Bro Abbot [ on]-- it is [right]. I am [not] sorry the rolls show Geo.A. Devereaux, whose papers you returned to me is not entitled to the [State] and be to Bounty thought I could not see how, by his discharge he could be ex- cluded and really now, I can not think he brings his case technically within both this letter and the shield of the law---he did pass the final ordeal was accepted and mustered into the U S service--and filled one of [ s] quota--after this he was taken sick and discharge for the season-- It was a sickness not on him when he [ ed] the service--it was a new matter--and in the same so far as his legal rights are concerned a though it had come on him two years and ten months after he [ ]. I the service Is is just so? --Truly yours C.P. Brown