Difference between revisions of ".MjAwMA.MjUxNDQ"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Sent Bangor July 26, 1864 General-- Andrew J. getchell [Pic?--] Co--"G" [ ] ["H?"] 2nd Regt Me Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull Run July 21/61--disch.d June 30/62 after bei...")
 
m (Protected ".MjAwMA.MjUxNDQ" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Sent
 
Sent
 +
 
Bangor July 26, 1864
 
Bangor July 26, 1864
 
General--
 
General--
Andrew J. getchell [Pic?--]
+
 
Co--"G" [ ] ["H?"] 2nd Regt Me
+
Andrew J. Getchell
 +
Co--"I" 2nd Regt Me
 
Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull
 
Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull
Run July 21/61--disch.d June 30/62
+
Run July 21/61--disch'd June 30/62
 
after being 10 ms a prisoner--
 
after being 10 ms a prisoner--
 
He applied for the
 
He applied for the
[ ] 100 Bounty under act March [ ]/63
+
$100 Bounty under act March [ ]/63
 
as having been discharged by reason of
 
as having been discharged by reason of
 
wounds record in Battle, he is clearly
 
wounds record in Battle, he is clearly
[ ]--
+
entitled--
 
The case having been referred to
 
The case having been referred to
the [ ] [ ] office Washington--
+
the Adjt Gen. office Washington--
He reported as follows--
+
was reported as follows--
"No evidence [ as file?]
+
"No evidence on file
for what are the soldier may discharge.
+
for what town the soldier was discharged.
He can not then returned to me to
+
The c[?] was then returned to me to
 
furnish the evidence.
 
furnish the evidence.
 
I sent the affidavit of his
 
I sent the affidavit of his
Capt. [Garvey?] and Col Roberts, [ ] to
+
Capt. Gurnsey and Col Roberts, [?] to
[ ] point--They say Gatchell dis-
+
[?] point--They say Getchell was a
charge calls him of Co. "G"--They
+
[?] Co. "H" 2nd ME --Getchells discharge
again return the [copies?] to me with the follow-
+
calls him of Co. "G" - they again return the papers to me with the  
ing endorsement, "Respectfully returned The evi-
+
following endorsement, "Respectfully returned The  
dence is insufficient in that the affidavit state,  
+
evidence is insufficient in that the affidavit states,  
 +
 
 
over
 
over

Latest revision as of 13:21, 29 October 2021

Sent

Bangor July 26, 1864 General--

Andrew J. Getchell Co--"I" 2nd Regt Me Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull Run July 21/61--disch'd June 30/62 after being 10 ms a prisoner-- He applied for the $100 Bounty under act March [ ]/63 as having been discharged by reason of wounds record in Battle, he is clearly entitled-- The case having been referred to the Adjt Gen. office Washington-- was reported as follows-- "No evidence on file for what town the soldier was discharged. The c[?] was then returned to me to furnish the evidence. I sent the affidavit of his Capt. Gurnsey and Col Roberts, [?] to [?] point--They say Getchell was a [?] Co. "H" 2nd ME --Getchells discharge calls him of Co. "G" - they again return the papers to me with the following endorsement, "Respectfully returned The evidence is insufficient in that the affidavit states,

over