Difference between revisions of ".MjEwOA.MzA0NDc"
(Created page with " 1041. Q. Without that you would not regard it as certain in that stage A. No...") |
HeatherMoran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1041. | 1041. | ||
| − | Q. Without that you would not regard it as certain in that stage A. No | + | Q. Without that you would not regard it as certain in that stage A. No sir |
Q. And yet a few moments afterwards the condition of the patient might become such that it would be extremely obvious would it not A. Very apparent within a short time. | Q. And yet a few moments afterwards the condition of the patient might become such that it would be extremely obvious would it not A. Very apparent within a short time. | ||
By Dr. Butler: | By Dr. Butler: | ||
Revision as of 17:00, 9 June 2022
1041.
Q. Without that you would not regard it as certain in that stage A. No sir Q. And yet a few moments afterwards the condition of the patient might become such that it would be extremely obvious would it not A. Very apparent within a short time. By Dr. Butler: Q. If you were called to a patient in the condition of this one, where she had been subject to this flowing and diarrhae, what method would you adopt to ascertain whether it was simply a case of flowing A. In [illegible] practice I should call in a proper attendant and make an examination unless the patient is in immediate danger Q. In this case would you not have used the attendant to examine A. Depend upon the age and experience of the attendant. If I had experienced attendant on nurse I could call readily I should call her. Q. Do you use the remedies that Dr. Sanborn speaks of using the day before, that of oil A. I have tried it in diarrhaes, and in times past tried it more.