Difference between revisions of ".MTUyOQ.MTUxOTE"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[James M Rogers case - continued -] | [James M Rogers case - continued -] | ||
| − | The House resumed the consideration of the causes assigned for the removal of James M Rogers &c - And Mr Denlois, Counsel for said Rogers was present. The Managers on the part of the House introduced a copy of the record of the indictment against said Rogers with the proceedings thereon, including the verdict of the Jury and the motion by the Defendant for a new trial. They also introduced a written opinion signed by two of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, that the motion for a new trial could not be sustained. the evidence being gone through on the part of the House, Mr Deblois commented upon the inadequacy of the testimony &c &c and Mr Todd made a short reply. The question was then put by the speaker, "Shall the Address to the Governor for the removal of James M Rogers from all the offices both civil & military which he now holds under the authority of this State", pass and decided in the affirmative 96 pro. 7 con. The address and accompanying documents were then sent up to the Senate for their concurrence. | + | The House resumed the consideration of the causes assigned for the removal of James M Rogers &c - And Mr Denlois, Counsel for said Rogers was present. The Managers on the part of the House introduced a copy of the record of the indictment against said Rogers with the proceedings thereon, including the verdict of the Jury and the motion by the Defendant for a new trial. They also introduced a written opinion signed by two of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, that the motion for a new trial could not be sustained. the evidence being gone through on the part of the House, Mr Deblois commented upon the inadequacy of the testimony &c &c and Mr Todd made a short reply. The question was then put by the speaker, "Shall the Address to the Governor for the removal of James M Rogers from all the offices both civil & military which he now holds under the authority of this State", pass and decided in the affirmative 96 pro. 7 con. The address and accompanying documents were then sent up to the Senate for their concurrence. |
| + | |||
| + | [Resolve - Penob. Indians] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resolve in favor of the Penobscot Indians, was read twice, amended at A. & passed to be engrossed. Sent up for concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Resolve - loan of $ 20,000] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resolve for obtaining a loan of twenty thousands dollars which passed this House this morning came from the Senate amended at A for concurrence - and the House concurred. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Resolve. Penob. Indians] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Resolve in favor of the Penobscot Indians, which passed this House a few moment since, with an amendment at A came from the Senate - that body | ||
Revision as of 20:53, 28 April 2020
229
Afternoon. Met according to adjournment.
[James M Rogers case - continued -]
The House resumed the consideration of the causes assigned for the removal of James M Rogers &c - And Mr Denlois, Counsel for said Rogers was present. The Managers on the part of the House introduced a copy of the record of the indictment against said Rogers with the proceedings thereon, including the verdict of the Jury and the motion by the Defendant for a new trial. They also introduced a written opinion signed by two of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court, that the motion for a new trial could not be sustained. the evidence being gone through on the part of the House, Mr Deblois commented upon the inadequacy of the testimony &c &c and Mr Todd made a short reply. The question was then put by the speaker, "Shall the Address to the Governor for the removal of James M Rogers from all the offices both civil & military which he now holds under the authority of this State", pass and decided in the affirmative 96 pro. 7 con. The address and accompanying documents were then sent up to the Senate for their concurrence.
[Resolve - Penob. Indians]
Resolve in favor of the Penobscot Indians, was read twice, amended at A. & passed to be engrossed. Sent up for concurrence.
[Resolve - loan of $ 20,000]
Resolve for obtaining a loan of twenty thousands dollars which passed this House this morning came from the Senate amended at A for concurrence - and the House concurred.
[Resolve. Penob. Indians]
Resolve in favor of the Penobscot Indians, which passed this House a few moment since, with an amendment at A came from the Senate - that body