Difference between revisions of ".MTUzMQ.MTMzOTA"
Rybrarian0 (talk | contribs) |
m (Protected ".MTUzMQ.MTMzOTA" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
reported a “Bill to provide for the inspection of pickled and smoked fish - in addition to the Act &c.” | reported a “Bill to provide for the inspection of pickled and smoked fish - in addition to the Act &c.” | ||
which was read twice and passed to be engrossed - Sent down for concurrence. | which was read twice and passed to be engrossed - Sent down for concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
[Petition committed] | [Petition committed] | ||
The petition of Gardner Brown and others of Bath relating to logs in Kennebec river - was read and committed to the Committee on Turnpikes, bridges & canals in concurrence with the House. | The petition of Gardner Brown and others of Bath relating to logs in Kennebec river - was read and committed to the Committee on Turnpikes, bridges & canals in concurrence with the House. | ||
| + | |||
[“] | [“] | ||
The petition of Bennet Pike & Luther Richardson praying to be refunded duty paid buy them as attorneys - was read and committed to the Committee on new trials in concurrence with the House. | The petition of Bennet Pike & Luther Richardson praying to be refunded duty paid buy them as attorneys - was read and committed to the Committee on new trials in concurrence with the House. | ||
| + | |||
[“] | [“] | ||
The petitions of John Blanchard that part of Lot No. 83 be set off from town of Cumberland and annexed to North Yarmouth - and of Solomon Loring & others that they may be set off from town of Cumberland & annexed to the town of North Yarmouth - were severally read and committed to the Committee on Incorporation of Towns in concurrence with the House. | The petitions of John Blanchard that part of Lot No. 83 be set off from town of Cumberland and annexed to North Yarmouth - and of Solomon Loring & others that they may be set off from town of Cumberland & annexed to the town of North Yarmouth - were severally read and committed to the Committee on Incorporation of Towns in concurrence with the House. | ||
| + | |||
[Report of committee] | [Report of committee] | ||
Mr Green from the Committee on Incorporation of Towns reported that Walter M. Bryant and others have leave to withdraw their petition - read and accepted and sent down for concurrence, came up concurred. | Mr Green from the Committee on Incorporation of Towns reported that Walter M. Bryant and others have leave to withdraw their petition - read and accepted and sent down for concurrence, came up concurred. | ||
| + | |||
[Returns of Banks] | [Returns of Banks] | ||
The following communication was received from the Secretary of State - to wit | The following communication was received from the Secretary of State - to wit | ||
Latest revision as of 14:23, 1 May 2020
reported a “Bill to provide for the inspection of pickled and smoked fish - in addition to the Act &c.” which was read twice and passed to be engrossed - Sent down for concurrence.
[Petition committed] The petition of Gardner Brown and others of Bath relating to logs in Kennebec river - was read and committed to the Committee on Turnpikes, bridges & canals in concurrence with the House.
[“] The petition of Bennet Pike & Luther Richardson praying to be refunded duty paid buy them as attorneys - was read and committed to the Committee on new trials in concurrence with the House.
[“] The petitions of John Blanchard that part of Lot No. 83 be set off from town of Cumberland and annexed to North Yarmouth - and of Solomon Loring & others that they may be set off from town of Cumberland & annexed to the town of North Yarmouth - were severally read and committed to the Committee on Incorporation of Towns in concurrence with the House.
[Report of committee] Mr Green from the Committee on Incorporation of Towns reported that Walter M. Bryant and others have leave to withdraw their petition - read and accepted and sent down for concurrence, came up concurred.
[Returns of Banks] The following communication was received from the Secretary of State - to wit “Hon. the President of the Senate - Sir - Secy. office Jan. 19, 1822 In obedience to the order of the Senate of the 18th instant I transmit to you such returns of the several banks in this State, as have been received at this office, since the last session of the Legislature - I have the honor to be &c Arthur Ware.”