Difference between revisions of ".MTUzMQ.MTM0NDU"
m (Protected ".MTUzMQ.MTM0NDU" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [146] Came up concurred and Messrs Gardiner, Scamman and Dunlap were joined on the part of the House. | + | [146] |
| + | |||
| + | Came up concurred and Messrs Gardiner, Scamman and Dunlap were joined on the part of the House. | ||
[1822 Jan. 31] | [1822 Jan. 31] | ||
| − | [Bill for relief of poor debtors] The Bill for the relief of Poor debtors being in the second reading, and again under consideration - | + | [Bill for relief of poor debtors] |
| + | The Bill for the relief of Poor debtors being in the second reading, and again under consideration - | ||
On motion of Mr. Bradbury to strike out the twenty first section added by way of amendment in the House to the printed bill, the question was taken by yeas and nays - which were thus - | On motion of Mr. Bradbury to strike out the twenty first section added by way of amendment in the House to the printed bill, the question was taken by yeas and nays - which were thus - | ||
Yeas - Messrs. Bradbury, McDonald, Tallman & Tuttle - 4 - | Yeas - Messrs. Bradbury, McDonald, Tallman & Tuttle - 4 - | ||
| − | Nays Messrs. Bond, Burnham, Buxton, Case, Dennett, Green, Holland, | + | Nays Messrs. Bond, Burnham, Buxton, Case, Dennett, Green, Holland, Morrill, O'Brien, Pierce, Poor, Ripley, Seaver, Wheeler & Witham - 15 |
So the question was decided in the negative - and the section was not struck out - | So the question was decided in the negative - and the section was not struck out - | ||
On motion by Mr. Bradbury that the parts of the first and second sections of said bill struck out by the vote of yesterday on questions of amendment - be restored - the question was taken by Yeas and Nays, which were thus | On motion by Mr. Bradbury that the parts of the first and second sections of said bill struck out by the vote of yesterday on questions of amendment - be restored - the question was taken by Yeas and Nays, which were thus | ||
Latest revision as of 17:13, 6 May 2020
[146]
Came up concurred and Messrs Gardiner, Scamman and Dunlap were joined on the part of the House.
[1822 Jan. 31] [Bill for relief of poor debtors] The Bill for the relief of Poor debtors being in the second reading, and again under consideration - On motion of Mr. Bradbury to strike out the twenty first section added by way of amendment in the House to the printed bill, the question was taken by yeas and nays - which were thus -
Yeas - Messrs. Bradbury, McDonald, Tallman & Tuttle - 4 - Nays Messrs. Bond, Burnham, Buxton, Case, Dennett, Green, Holland, Morrill, O'Brien, Pierce, Poor, Ripley, Seaver, Wheeler & Witham - 15 So the question was decided in the negative - and the section was not struck out - On motion by Mr. Bradbury that the parts of the first and second sections of said bill struck out by the vote of yesterday on questions of amendment - be restored - the question was taken by Yeas and Nays, which were thus
Yeas - Messrs. Bradbury, Burnham, Dennett, McDonald, Pierce & Tallman - 6 Nays - Messrs. Bond, Buxton, Case, Green, Holland, O'Brien, Poor, Ripley, Seaver, Tuttle, Wheeler, Witham and Morrill, 13
So the question was decided in the negative - and the parts of those sections struck out were not restored. The Bill was then committee to Messrs. Holland and Case for the purpose of arranging the amendments -
The Senate adjourned.