Difference between revisions of ".MTU0MA.MTUyODI"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
8 | 8 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | by the selectmen; also the votes of the town of Leeds in the same county, they having been returned with the votes for Governor and under the same seal; also the votes of Vienna in the same county, as they were not returned thirty days before the first Wednesday of January, | + | [1823 January 2] |
| + | |||
| + | by the selectmen; also the votes of the town of Leeds in the same county, they having been returned with the votes for Governor and under the same seal; also the votes of Vienna in the same county, as they were not returned thirty days before the first Wednesday of January, into the Secretary's office; also the votes of Winslow & Dearborn in the same county, because it does not appear that the list of persons voted for, and the votes in the former town were ever recorded or any declaration thereof made in open town meeting, and because the list of persons voted for and of the votes in the latter town do not appear to be attested by the Selectmen thereof. - | ||
[rejected votes] | [rejected votes] | ||
| − | Your committee have rejected the votes of Hebron in the county of Oxford because the copy of the list of votes does not appear to be attested by the Town Clerk; and also the votes of Sweden, Fryeburg | + | |
| − | They have rejected votes of Belfast in the county of Hancock, because the copy of the list thereof does not appear to be attested by the Selectmen, the votes of Knox in the same county, the copy of the list not appearing to be attested by the Town Clerk; the votes of Orland in the same county, the copy of the list thereof not being attested by the Selectmen | + | Your committee have rejected the votes of Hebron in the county of Oxford because the copy of the list of votes does not appear to be attested by the Town Clerk; and also the votes of Sweden, Fryeburg Addition & Plantation No. 8 in the same County, it being uncertain how many votes were given for each candidates. |
| − | + | ||
| + | They have rejected the votes of Belfast in the county of Hancock, because the copy of the list thereof does not appear to be attested by the Selectmen, the votes of Knox in the same county, the copy of the list not appearing to be attested by the Town Clerk; the votes of Orland in the same county, the copy of the list thereof not being attested by the Selectmen; and also the votes of Plantation No.14 in same county the copy of the list thereof not being attested by the assessors. - | ||
| + | |||
| + | The votes of Plantation No. 9 in the County of Washington have been rejected, the copy of the list not being attested by the Plantation Clerk. - | ||
Revision as of 19:31, 18 May 2020
8
[1823 January 2]
by the selectmen; also the votes of the town of Leeds in the same county, they having been returned with the votes for Governor and under the same seal; also the votes of Vienna in the same county, as they were not returned thirty days before the first Wednesday of January, into the Secretary's office; also the votes of Winslow & Dearborn in the same county, because it does not appear that the list of persons voted for, and the votes in the former town were ever recorded or any declaration thereof made in open town meeting, and because the list of persons voted for and of the votes in the latter town do not appear to be attested by the Selectmen thereof. -
[rejected votes]
Your committee have rejected the votes of Hebron in the county of Oxford because the copy of the list of votes does not appear to be attested by the Town Clerk; and also the votes of Sweden, Fryeburg Addition & Plantation No. 8 in the same County, it being uncertain how many votes were given for each candidates.
They have rejected the votes of Belfast in the county of Hancock, because the copy of the list thereof does not appear to be attested by the Selectmen, the votes of Knox in the same county, the copy of the list not appearing to be attested by the Town Clerk; the votes of Orland in the same county, the copy of the list thereof not being attested by the Selectmen; and also the votes of Plantation No.14 in same county the copy of the list thereof not being attested by the assessors. -
The votes of Plantation No. 9 in the County of Washington have been rejected, the copy of the list not being attested by the Plantation Clerk. -