.MTUyOQ.MTUyMTY

254

virtuous and industrious poor. And that this has been the case in some of the States, we have abundant evidence from the highest authority. What salutary effect could be expected from such punishment, either in producing a reformation of character or deterring from the commission of crime. Sanguinary laws and punishments are altogether inconsistent with our principles of government, and expressly prohibited in our declaration of rights. Indeed, there is little reason for believing that severe laws would have any tendency to diminish crime. In the country whose criminal code numbers upwards of two hundred capital offences, violations and convictions are no less numerous, in proportion to population, than in others where capital punishment is rarely inflicted. The revival of corporal punishment for offences not capital, will not probably be again generally resolved to in this country. Rather should we hope that the necessity for capital punishment may be diminished, if not wholly obviated by some other equally promotive of the public safety. It is not more the duty of the Legislature to enact laws for the security of society, than to provide the necessary means of enforcing those laws. Their violation must be followed by certain punishment, graduated by the character of the offence without unnecessary severity to the offenders. Experience has shown that punishment to be to be the most effectual in arresting the moral disease, and producing reformation, which separates the convicts from all intercourse with others; deprives him of every object which attracts the attention, and leaves him, uninterruptedly, to the reflection of his conduct, and the accusations of his conscience. Thus secluded, with the sacred volume for his companion, if the criminal be not reformed, he will at least be convinced that the