Difference between revisions of ".MTU0MA.MTU1MDQ"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected ".MTU0MA.MTU1MDQ" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
230
 
230
[1823
+
 
February 4]
+
[1823 February 4]
they nonconcurred the House, and passed the Resolve to be engrossed as amended.
+
 
 +
they nonconcurred the House, and passed the Resolve to be engrossed as amended. -
  
 
[Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan]
 
[Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan]
Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan was read a second time and passed to be engrossed with an amendment; sent down for concurrence.
+
 
 +
Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan was read a second time and passed to be engrossed with an amendment; sent down for concurrence. -
  
 
[Notice for an reconsideration]
 
[Notice for an reconsideration]
Mr. Witham gave notice that he should tomorrow at ten oclock move for a reconsideration of the vote by which the Bill for encouragement of Literature was indefinitely postponed.
+
 
 +
Mr. Witham gave notice that he should tomorrow at ten oclock move for a reconsideration of the vote by which the Bill for encouragement of Literature was indefinitely postponed. -
  
 
[Bill for the preservation of Fish in Union River]
 
[Bill for the preservation of Fish in Union River]
Bill making further provision for the preservation of Fish in the Union River Bay and its waters, passed to be engrossed in the House, came up for concurrence, was read once and committed and tomorrow at ten oclock assigned for a second reading.
+
 
 +
Bill making further provision for the preservation of Fish in the Union River Bay, and its waters, passed to be engrossed in the House, came up for concurrence, was read once and committed, and tomorrow at ten oclock assigned for a second reading. -
  
 
[Report on Petition]
 
[Report on Petition]
Mr. Bond from the Committee to whom was referred the petition of William Stinson and others, praying for the removal of James. M. Rogers from the offices he holds under this State, reported an address to the Governor and Council and also the causes for his removal. The further reported that the said causes of removal be entered on the Journal of the Senate and a true copy thereof attested by the Secretary of the Senate, be served on the said Rogers by William Stinson of Bowdoinham, who shall deliver the same to the said Rogers in person forthwith and notify him to appear before the Legislature on Saturday,
+
 
 +
Mr. Bond from the Committee to whom was referred the petition of William Stinson and others, praying for the removal of James. M. Rogers from the offices he holds under this State, reported an address to the Governor and Council and also the causes for his removal. - The further reported that the said causes of removal be entered on the Journal of the Senate, and a true copy thereof attested by the Secretary of the Senate, be served on the said Rogers by William Stinson of Bowdoinham, who shall deliver the same to the said Rogers in person forthwith and notify him to appear before the Legislature on Saturday,

Latest revision as of 13:28, 23 July 2020

230

[1823 February 4]

they nonconcurred the House, and passed the Resolve to be engrossed as amended. -

[Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan]

Bill respecting a Bridge at Sullivan was read a second time and passed to be engrossed with an amendment; sent down for concurrence. -

[Notice for an reconsideration]

Mr. Witham gave notice that he should tomorrow at ten oclock move for a reconsideration of the vote by which the Bill for encouragement of Literature was indefinitely postponed. -

[Bill for the preservation of Fish in Union River]

Bill making further provision for the preservation of Fish in the Union River Bay, and its waters, passed to be engrossed in the House, came up for concurrence, was read once and committed, and tomorrow at ten oclock assigned for a second reading. -

[Report on Petition]

Mr. Bond from the Committee to whom was referred the petition of William Stinson and others, praying for the removal of James. M. Rogers from the offices he holds under this State, reported an address to the Governor and Council and also the causes for his removal. - The further reported that the said causes of removal be entered on the Journal of the Senate, and a true copy thereof attested by the Secretary of the Senate, be served on the said Rogers by William Stinson of Bowdoinham, who shall deliver the same to the said Rogers in person forthwith and notify him to appear before the Legislature on Saturday,