Difference between revisions of ".MTUzMw.MTU3NDE"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
89
 
89
  
[1824] [Petition] Petition of Artemas Leonard and others for a Bank at Hallowell, committed in the House to the Committee on Banks & Banking, came up for concurrence, was read and concurred.
+
[1824]
 +
[Petition]
 +
Petition of Artemas Leonard and others for a Bank at Hallowell, committed in the House to the Committee on Banks & Banking, came up for concurrence, was read and concurred.
  
[Petitions referred] The following Petitions committed in the House to the Committee on New Trials, came up for concurrence, viz:
+
[Petitions referred]
 +
The following Petitions committed in the House to the Committee on New Trials, came up for concurrence, viz:
 
Petition of George Watson to have twenty five Dollars refunded to him from the Treasury of the State;
 
Petition of George Watson to have twenty five Dollars refunded to him from the Treasury of the State;
 
Petition of Minot that sixty dollars assessed on them by mistake, be refunded to them; and
 
Petition of Minot that sixty dollars assessed on them by mistake, be refunded to them; and

Revision as of 15:01, 2 September 2020

89

[1824] [Petition] Petition of Artemas Leonard and others for a Bank at Hallowell, committed in the House to the Committee on Banks & Banking, came up for concurrence, was read and concurred.

[Petitions referred] The following Petitions committed in the House to the Committee on New Trials, came up for concurrence, viz: Petition of George Watson to have twenty five Dollars refunded to him from the Treasury of the State; Petition of Minot that sixty dollars assessed on them by mistake, be refunded to them; and Petition of Archelaus Lewis and John Gordon for a New Trial, and they were severally read and referred to the same Committee in concurrence with the House.

Adjourned

Attest C. B. Smith Secy.