Difference between revisions of ".MTczOA.MjA0MjQ"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
(Created page with "324 Reuben Bartlett Joseph Kelsey Daniel Emery William R Lowney Abiathar Richardson Peter Rowe David Goddard Jacob Trafton Thomas Snow John C Glidden David Leman Robe...") |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[See page 82.] | [See page 82.] | ||
| − | On the question of accepting the report of the Committee on contested elections in the case of Andrew Roberts. | + | On the question of accepting the report of the Committee on contested elections in the case of Andrew Roberts. |
| + | |||
| + | Daniel Goodenow | ||
| + | Richard Shapleigh | ||
| + | Daniel Deshon | ||
| + | Edwards E Bourne | ||
| + | Jonathan Stone Junr | ||
| + | Nathaniel Hill | ||
| + | John Sanborne | ||
| + | Gamaliel E. Smith | ||
| + | George Scamman | ||
| + | John Powers | ||
| + | Nicholas Gilman | ||
| + | William Curtis | ||
| + | John Willet | ||
| + | Ebenezer Wells | ||
Revision as of 12:39, 18 September 2020
324
Reuben Bartlett Joseph Kelsey Daniel Emery William R Lowney Abiathar Richardson Peter Rowe David Goddard Jacob Trafton Thomas Snow John C Glidden David Leman Robert Lambert Ebenezer Knowlton David Alder Junr David Swett Benjamin Carr Joseph C Small Yeas. 87. Nays. 76.
[See page 82.]
On the question of accepting the report of the Committee on contested elections in the case of Andrew Roberts.
Daniel Goodenow Richard Shapleigh Daniel Deshon Edwards E Bourne Jonathan Stone Junr Nathaniel Hill John Sanborne Gamaliel E. Smith George Scamman John Powers Nicholas Gilman William Curtis John Willet Ebenezer Wells