Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mw.MjEyNTc"
(Created page with "176 passing to be engrossed the Resolve in favor of Waterville Light Infantry and Monday next at eleven o'clock was assigned for the consideration of said motion. Mr. Perkins...") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Mr. Perkins of Kennebunk Port Moved to reconsider the vote postponing indefinitely the Resolve in favor of Daniel I. Perley and Tuesday next at eleven o'clock was assigned for the consideration of said motion. | Mr. Perkins of Kennebunk Port Moved to reconsider the vote postponing indefinitely the Resolve in favor of Daniel I. Perley and Tuesday next at eleven o'clock was assigned for the consideration of said motion. | ||
| + | |||
The Committee on Engrossed Bills report as duly engrossed Bill - to modify the terms and conditions of the act for Separation which was passed to be enacted - sent up for concurrence. | The Committee on Engrossed Bills report as duly engrossed Bill - to modify the terms and conditions of the act for Separation which was passed to be enacted - sent up for concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
Resolve requesting the Governor to transmit to the Governor of Massachusetts an act of this State - was read a first and second time and passed to be engrossed in concurrence with the Senate. | Resolve requesting the Governor to transmit to the Governor of Massachusetts an act of this State - was read a first and second time and passed to be engrossed in concurrence with the Senate. | ||
Report of the Committee appointed to receive the property from the late Treasurer Elias Thomas Esq - came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred. | Report of the Committee appointed to receive the property from the late Treasurer Elias Thomas Esq - came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred. | ||
| + | |||
Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred an Order in relation to altering the act relating to the attachment of personal property passed March 15, 1821 asking to be discharged from further consideration of the subject - was read and accepted. Sent up for concurrence. | Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred an Order in relation to altering the act relating to the attachment of personal property passed March 15, 1821 asking to be discharged from further consideration of the subject - was read and accepted. Sent up for concurrence. | ||
| − | Ordered that the committee on the Judiciary inquire into the expediency of making special provision by law for the relief of | + | |
| + | Ordered that the committee on the Judiciary inquire into the expediency of making special provision by law for the relief of towns situated on the eastern frontier who are subject to expense in supporting foreign paupers. | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 2 November 2020
176 passing to be engrossed the Resolve in favor of Waterville Light Infantry and Monday next at eleven o'clock was assigned for the consideration of said motion.
Mr. Perkins of Kennebunk Port Moved to reconsider the vote postponing indefinitely the Resolve in favor of Daniel I. Perley and Tuesday next at eleven o'clock was assigned for the consideration of said motion.
The Committee on Engrossed Bills report as duly engrossed Bill - to modify the terms and conditions of the act for Separation which was passed to be enacted - sent up for concurrence.
Resolve requesting the Governor to transmit to the Governor of Massachusetts an act of this State - was read a first and second time and passed to be engrossed in concurrence with the Senate.
Report of the Committee appointed to receive the property from the late Treasurer Elias Thomas Esq - came from the Senate accepted for concurrence - and the House concurred.
Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred an Order in relation to altering the act relating to the attachment of personal property passed March 15, 1821 asking to be discharged from further consideration of the subject - was read and accepted. Sent up for concurrence.
Ordered that the committee on the Judiciary inquire into the expediency of making special provision by law for the relief of towns situated on the eastern frontier who are subject to expense in supporting foreign paupers.