Difference between revisions of ".MTczMg.MTkyMDA"
(Created page with "82 Wednesday January 23rd 1828 [left margin] Order of H. R. Sheriffs Fees Order of the House of Representatives that the committee who have under consideration the subject...") |
m (Protected ".MTczMg.MTkyMDA" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Wednesday January 23rd 1828 | Wednesday January 23rd 1828 | ||
| − | [ | + | [Order of H. R. |
| − | Order of H. R. | + | Sheriffs Fees] |
| − | Sheriffs Fees | ||
Order of the House of Representatives that the committee | Order of the House of Representatives that the committee | ||
who have under consideration the subject relating to Sheriffs | who have under consideration the subject relating to Sheriffs | ||
| − | be instructed to report a bill providing a reduction of | + | be instructed to report a bill providing a reduction of fifteen per cent on collection fees. to prohibit the Sheriffs from |
| − | |||
taking from their Deputies any sum exceeding ten per cent | taking from their Deputies any sum exceeding ten per cent | ||
on all collection fees - to fix the daily allowance of the | on all collection fees - to fix the daily allowance of the | ||
Sheriffs while attending Courts at Three Dollars per day | Sheriffs while attending Courts at Three Dollars per day | ||
| − | - and also to make such general provisions as shall be | + | - and also to make such general provisions as shall be necessary to make the system conformable to this order - was read and non concurred |
| − | + | ||
| + | [Order of H.R. | ||
| + | Attachment] | ||
| + | |||
| + | "That Messrs Shaw, White and Goodwin with such as the | ||
| + | Senate may join be a Committee to inquire into the expediency | ||
| + | of repealing the Act passed March 7th 1826 exempting certain | ||
| + | goods and chattels from attachment and execution, came up | ||
| + | for concurrence - non concurred and referred the committee | ||
| + | on the Judiciary. Sent down for concurrence. concurred | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Order of H.R. | ||
| + | Law relating to | ||
| + | Highways] | ||
| + | |||
| + | That the Committee on the Judiciary be instructed to | ||
| + | inquire into the expediency of so amending the Law in relation to highways as to limit the time for claiming damages | ||
| + | for land taken for any public street or highway laid out by | ||
| + | authority of the town was read and passed in concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Resolve - | ||
| + | Township No 6 R. | ||
| + | 9 Penobscot] | ||
| + | Resolve in favor of the North half of township No. 6, 9th Range | ||
| + | in Penobscot County was read once, Friday 10 oclock assigned for | ||
| + | a second reading and comd to Messrs Hathaway, Cushman and Weston | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Bill] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bill in addition to an act for the regulation of Innholders | ||
| + | Retailers | ||
Latest revision as of 21:24, 2 November 2020
82 Wednesday January 23rd 1828
[Order of H. R. Sheriffs Fees]
Order of the House of Representatives that the committee who have under consideration the subject relating to Sheriffs be instructed to report a bill providing a reduction of fifteen per cent on collection fees. to prohibit the Sheriffs from taking from their Deputies any sum exceeding ten per cent on all collection fees - to fix the daily allowance of the Sheriffs while attending Courts at Three Dollars per day
- and also to make such general provisions as shall be necessary to make the system conformable to this order - was read and non concurred
[Order of H.R. Attachment]
"That Messrs Shaw, White and Goodwin with such as the Senate may join be a Committee to inquire into the expediency of repealing the Act passed March 7th 1826 exempting certain goods and chattels from attachment and execution, came up for concurrence - non concurred and referred the committee on the Judiciary. Sent down for concurrence. concurred
[Order of H.R. Law relating to Highways]
That the Committee on the Judiciary be instructed to inquire into the expediency of so amending the Law in relation to highways as to limit the time for claiming damages for land taken for any public street or highway laid out by authority of the town was read and passed in concurrence.
[Resolve - Township No 6 R. 9 Penobscot] Resolve in favor of the North half of township No. 6, 9th Range in Penobscot County was read once, Friday 10 oclock assigned for a second reading and comd to Messrs Hathaway, Cushman and Weston
[Bill]
Bill in addition to an act for the regulation of Innholders Retailers