Difference between revisions of ".MTczNA.MTk4NjM"
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) m (Protected ".MTczNA.MTk4NjM" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | 75 | |
| + | |||
On motion of Mr Hyde of Bath | On motion of Mr Hyde of Bath | ||
| − | + | Ordered, That the joint standing committee on the Judiciary be directed to take into consideration the expediency of authorizing the town of Bath to assess a tax on the owners of dogs in conformity to a law passed Feby 26 1825 giving that power to the town of Portland - read and passed - Sent up for concurrence - | |
| − | The committee on engrossed Bills reported as duly engrossed Resolve in favor of Thomas H Norcross, which was finally passed. Sent up for concurrence. | + | The committee on engrossed Bills reported as duly engrossed |
| + | Resolve in favor of Thomas H Norcross, | ||
| + | which was finally passed. Sent up for concurrence. | ||
| − | Ordered That Messrs Fillebrown of | + | Ordered That Messrs Fillebrown of Winthrop, Folsom of Eastport & Chase of Kittery be a committee with such as the Senate may join to receive sealed proposals from the several Printers, which proposals shall be held entire by said committee until the second day of February next, after which time said proposals shall be opened and examined by said committee who are authorized to contract to have all the printing done as to them shall appear most for the advantage and interest of the State - read & passed. Sent up for concurrence. |
| − | Resolve in favor of Oldtown Bridge Corporation, was reported with a statement of | + | Resolve in favor of Oldtown Bridge Corporation, was reported with a statement of facts in relation to the subject The House took up the consideration of the subject, when Mr McCobb moved an indefinite postponement - but before the question was taken the House |
Adjourned. | Adjourned. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
Attest | Attest | ||
James L Child | James L Child | ||
| − | Clerk | + | Clerk. |
Latest revision as of 13:53, 23 November 2020
75
On motion of Mr Hyde of Bath Ordered, That the joint standing committee on the Judiciary be directed to take into consideration the expediency of authorizing the town of Bath to assess a tax on the owners of dogs in conformity to a law passed Feby 26 1825 giving that power to the town of Portland - read and passed - Sent up for concurrence -
The committee on engrossed Bills reported as duly engrossed Resolve in favor of Thomas H Norcross, which was finally passed. Sent up for concurrence.
Ordered That Messrs Fillebrown of Winthrop, Folsom of Eastport & Chase of Kittery be a committee with such as the Senate may join to receive sealed proposals from the several Printers, which proposals shall be held entire by said committee until the second day of February next, after which time said proposals shall be opened and examined by said committee who are authorized to contract to have all the printing done as to them shall appear most for the advantage and interest of the State - read & passed. Sent up for concurrence.
Resolve in favor of Oldtown Bridge Corporation, was reported with a statement of facts in relation to the subject The House took up the consideration of the subject, when Mr McCobb moved an indefinite postponement - but before the question was taken the House
Adjourned.
Attest James L Child Clerk.