Difference between revisions of ".MTc4NA.MjE4MTY"
(Created page with "149 Saturday February 12, 1831 [Sebois West Branch Sluice] An Act to incorporate the Sebois West Branch Sluice, was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. Sent down fo...") |
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) m (Protected ".MTc4NA.MjE4MTY" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | 149 | + | 149. |
| − | Saturday February 12, 1831 | + | |
| + | Saturday, February 12, 1831. | ||
| + | |||
[Sebois West Branch Sluice] | [Sebois West Branch Sluice] | ||
| − | An Act to incorporate the Sebois West Branch Sluice | + | An Act to incorporate the Sebois West Branch Sluice - was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. Sent down for concurrence. |
| − | [Report on pet. of Edwd. Smith & als] | + | |
| − | Mr. Sweat from the Joint standing committee on State | + | [Report on pet. of Edwd. Smith & als.] |
| − | [Petitions | + | Mr. Sweat from the Joint standing committee on State lands, reported an order of notice on the petition of Edward Smith and others, read and accepted. Sent down for concurrence. |
| + | |||
| + | [Petitions refered.] | ||
The petition of the Town of Hebron, for separate representation, and the | The petition of the Town of Hebron, for separate representation, and the | ||
| − | Remonstrance of Joseph Hutchinson and others against said petition, were severally read and referred to the Joint | + | Remonstrance of Joseph Hutchinson and others against said petition, were severally read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the apportionment of Representatives, in concurrence. |
| − | The petition of Jonathan Hall for divorce, was read and referred to the Joint | + | |
| − | The petition of | + | The petition of Jonathan Hall for divorce, was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the Judiciary - in concurrence. - |
| − | [Remonstrance | + | |
| − | Remonstrance of James Osborn, Jr. and others | + | The petition of John Dickinson, Judge of Probate for Washington county, for increase of salary, was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the Judiciary in concurrence. |
| − | [Pet. | + | |
| − | The petition of Ira | + | [Remonstrance refered.] |
| + | Remonstrance of James Osborn, Jr. and others - against the petition of Eliphalet Perkins and others - was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on Turnpikes, Bridges and canals in concurrence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [Pet. refered] | ||
| + | The petition of Ira P. Woodbury and others, for a Branch to the Cumberland and Oxford canal, was read and referred to the same committee, in concurrence. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:09, 22 January 2021
149.
Saturday, February 12, 1831.
[Sebois West Branch Sluice] An Act to incorporate the Sebois West Branch Sluice - was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. Sent down for concurrence.
[Report on pet. of Edwd. Smith & als.] Mr. Sweat from the Joint standing committee on State lands, reported an order of notice on the petition of Edward Smith and others, read and accepted. Sent down for concurrence.
[Petitions refered.] The petition of the Town of Hebron, for separate representation, and the Remonstrance of Joseph Hutchinson and others against said petition, were severally read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the apportionment of Representatives, in concurrence.
The petition of Jonathan Hall for divorce, was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the Judiciary - in concurrence. -
The petition of John Dickinson, Judge of Probate for Washington county, for increase of salary, was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on the Judiciary in concurrence.
[Remonstrance refered.] Remonstrance of James Osborn, Jr. and others - against the petition of Eliphalet Perkins and others - was read and referred to the Joint standing committee on Turnpikes, Bridges and canals in concurrence.
[Pet. refered] The petition of Ira P. Woodbury and others, for a Branch to the Cumberland and Oxford canal, was read and referred to the same committee, in concurrence.