Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mw.MjE0Mzc"
(Created page with "356 prosperity of the State would thereby be more effectually promoted than by any sales, however advantageous in other respects, without attaining this more desirable and imp...") |
m (Protected ".MTc4Mw.MjE0Mzc" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
356 | 356 | ||
| − | prosperity of the | + | |
| − | The unsettled state of the North Eastern boundary, and also the tenure, by which these lands are held by the State in common with Massachusetts cannot fail of proving disadvantageous and perplexing to the interests of both States. The improvement of the | + | prosperity of the state would thereby be more effectually promoted than by any sales, however advantageous in other respects, without attaining this more desirable and important object - It is true, that purchasers of large tracts of land have many inducements to sell the same to actual settlers, especially after the most valuable timber on them shall have been disposed of. But from the large quantities that have recently been sold by the State, the market is at present supplied; and the expediency of checking the sale of large tracts of land to individual proprietors, and affording additional encouragement to actual settlers, is respectfully submitted to your consideration. |
| − | + | ||
| + | The unsettled state of the North Eastern boundary, and also the tenure, by which these lands are held by the State in common with Massachusetts cannot fail of proving disadvantageous and perplexing to the interests of both States. The improvement of the lands by making roads, clearing the obstructions in the rivers, and by other means, thus enhancing their value and promoting their settlement, is impeded by requiring the cooperation of another State, which inconvenience is but partially remedied by the division into townships as heretofore practiced, to be held by the two States in severalty. In some respects it would be more beneficial to both States that partition should be made of all the undivided lands into two entire parts, each of which would then be more exclusively under the control of the State to which it belonged. Still I am persuaded, that in any plan that could be devised, difficulties and objections might reasonably be apprehended, which a prudent foresight would require, if possible, to be guarded against and avoided. That Massachusetts should continue to possess within the limits of this State so great a portion of the territory, which is thus placed beyond our control, and over which our jurisdiction can be but partially extended, is an anomaly which the public feeling, the interest, and future prosperity of this rising State imperiously require to be removed, | ||
Latest revision as of 17:47, 29 March 2021
356
prosperity of the state would thereby be more effectually promoted than by any sales, however advantageous in other respects, without attaining this more desirable and important object - It is true, that purchasers of large tracts of land have many inducements to sell the same to actual settlers, especially after the most valuable timber on them shall have been disposed of. But from the large quantities that have recently been sold by the State, the market is at present supplied; and the expediency of checking the sale of large tracts of land to individual proprietors, and affording additional encouragement to actual settlers, is respectfully submitted to your consideration.
The unsettled state of the North Eastern boundary, and also the tenure, by which these lands are held by the State in common with Massachusetts cannot fail of proving disadvantageous and perplexing to the interests of both States. The improvement of the lands by making roads, clearing the obstructions in the rivers, and by other means, thus enhancing their value and promoting their settlement, is impeded by requiring the cooperation of another State, which inconvenience is but partially remedied by the division into townships as heretofore practiced, to be held by the two States in severalty. In some respects it would be more beneficial to both States that partition should be made of all the undivided lands into two entire parts, each of which would then be more exclusively under the control of the State to which it belonged. Still I am persuaded, that in any plan that could be devised, difficulties and objections might reasonably be apprehended, which a prudent foresight would require, if possible, to be guarded against and avoided. That Massachusetts should continue to possess within the limits of this State so great a portion of the territory, which is thus placed beyond our control, and over which our jurisdiction can be but partially extended, is an anomaly which the public feeling, the interest, and future prosperity of this rising State imperiously require to be removed,