Difference between revisions of ".MTUzNg.MTY3ODg"
Johnbarden (talk | contribs) m (Protected ".MTUzNg.MTY3ODg" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
183 | 183 | ||
− | |||
− | The Committee on the order respecting Trespasses & of | + | Resolve respecting Settlers on St John & Mattawaska Rivers, was read once and referred to Messrs Boutelle of Waterville, Dane of Kennebunk and Howard of Winthrop. |
+ | |||
+ | The Committee on the order respecting Trespasses &c of 12 Jany. reported a reference of the subject to the next Legislature - report accepted | ||
The Committee on subject of allowing depositions to be taken in Criminal cases not felonious, reported that it is inexpedient to make any further provisions on that subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. | The Committee on subject of allowing depositions to be taken in Criminal cases not felonious, reported that it is inexpedient to make any further provisions on that subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. | ||
− | The Committee on subject of authorizing Ministers of Roman Catholic & Protestant Episcopal Churches to solemnize Marriages & - reported that it is inexpedient to do so - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. | + | The Committee on subject of authorizing Ministers of Roman Catholic & Protestant Episcopal Churches to solemnize Marriages &c - reported that it is inexpedient to do so - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. |
− | The Committee to revise the law giving powers to Surveyors of Highways, Selectmen & - reported that no further provisions on the subject are necessary - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. | + | The Committee to revise the law giving powers to Surveyors of Highways, Selectmen &c - reported that no further provisions on the subject are necessary - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. |
− | The Committee to revise the law relating to Reviews of Actions & reported that no further legislation is necessary on the subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate | + | The Committee to revise the law relating to Reviews of Actions &c reported that no further legislation is necessary on the subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate |
− | The Committee to revise the Probate laws, reported no | + | The Committee to revise the Probate laws, reported no alteration therein is expedient at this time - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. |
− | The Committee to authorize sale of | + | The Committee to authorize sale of rangeways &c reported that no legislation on that subject is necessary - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate. |
Report on petition of Robert Page and als, granting an order of Notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence and the House concurred. | Report on petition of Robert Page and als, granting an order of Notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence and the House concurred. |
Latest revision as of 11:22, 6 August 2020
183
Resolve respecting Settlers on St John & Mattawaska Rivers, was read once and referred to Messrs Boutelle of Waterville, Dane of Kennebunk and Howard of Winthrop.
The Committee on the order respecting Trespasses &c of 12 Jany. reported a reference of the subject to the next Legislature - report accepted
The Committee on subject of allowing depositions to be taken in Criminal cases not felonious, reported that it is inexpedient to make any further provisions on that subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate.
The Committee on subject of authorizing Ministers of Roman Catholic & Protestant Episcopal Churches to solemnize Marriages &c - reported that it is inexpedient to do so - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate.
The Committee to revise the law giving powers to Surveyors of Highways, Selectmen &c - reported that no further provisions on the subject are necessary - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate.
The Committee to revise the law relating to Reviews of Actions &c reported that no further legislation is necessary on the subject - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate
The Committee to revise the Probate laws, reported no alteration therein is expedient at this time - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate.
The Committee to authorize sale of rangeways &c reported that no legislation on that subject is necessary - and the report was accepted in concurrence with the Senate.
Report on petition of Robert Page and als, granting an order of Notice, came from the Senate accepted for concurrence and the House concurred.