Difference between revisions of ".MTY2NQ.MTg0MTI"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "143 [Right margin: Legislature. 1827.] Legislature might have a recess on Tuesday the 20th day of February instant and the same was read, amended by striking “Tuesday, 20...")
 
m (Protected ".MTY2NQ.MTg0MTI" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
143
 
143
  
[Right margin: Legislature.
+
[1827.]
 
 
1827.]
 
  
 +
[Legislature.]
 
Legislature might have a recess on Tuesday the 20th day of February instant and the same was read, amended by striking “Tuesday, 20th” and inserting “Saturday 17th,” and accepted, Sent down for concurrence  Concurred
 
Legislature might have a recess on Tuesday the 20th day of February instant and the same was read, amended by striking “Tuesday, 20th” and inserting “Saturday 17th,” and accepted, Sent down for concurrence  Concurred
  
[Right margin: Bill respecting toll Bridges.]
+
[Bill respecting toll Bridges.]
 
 
 
Bill respecting toll Bridges was read a second time and passed to be engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence.
 
Bill respecting toll Bridges was read a second time and passed to be engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence.
  
Line 15: Line 13:
 
Afternoon,
 
Afternoon,
  
[Right margin: Resolve establishing the Seat of Government.]
+
[Resolve establishing the Seat of Government.]
 
 
 
Resolve establishing the seat of Government came up amended and the Senate reconsidered their former vote so far as to adopt the amendments proposed by the House and the question “shall this Resolve now pass to be engrossed as amended in concurrence with the House ordered to be taken by yeas and nays was decided in the affirmative as follows
 
Resolve establishing the seat of Government came up amended and the Senate reconsidered their former vote so far as to adopt the amendments proposed by the House and the question “shall this Resolve now pass to be engrossed as amended in concurrence with the House ordered to be taken by yeas and nays was decided in the affirmative as follows
  
[Right margin: Yeas.]
+
[Yeas.]
 
 
 
Yeas
 
Yeas
 +
Messrs. Dennett, Sweat, Kimball, Southwick, Williams, Francis, Grover, Washburn, Weston and Butman, (Ten)
  
Messrs. Dennett, Sweat, Kimball, Southwick, Williams, Francis, Grover, Washburn, Weston and Butman[?], (Ten)
+
[Nays.]
 
 
[Right margin: Nays.]
 
 
 
 
Nays
 
Nays
 
 
Messrs. Dunlap, Churchill, Dunn, Stebbins, Parsons, Elwell, Gardner, Hathaway and Balkam (Nine)
 
Messrs. Dunlap, Churchill, Dunn, Stebbins, Parsons, Elwell, Gardner, Hathaway and Balkam (Nine)
  
[Right margin: Bill add. respecting the passg. of fish in the seven mile Brook in V.]
+
[Bill add. respecting the passg. of fish in the seven mile Brook in V.]
 
 
 
Bill additional respecting the “passing of fish in the seven mile Brook in Vassalborough was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. sent down for concurrence
 
Bill additional respecting the “passing of fish in the seven mile Brook in Vassalborough was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. sent down for concurrence
  
[Right margin: Report. Resolve in favor of the town of Calais.]
+
[Report. Resolve in favor of the town of Calais.]
 
 
 
Mr. Balkam from the Committee reported Resolve in favor of the town of Calais as by the House taken into a new draft, and the same was read and passed to be engrossed as taken into the new draft further amended. sent down for concurrence.
 
Mr. Balkam from the Committee reported Resolve in favor of the town of Calais as by the House taken into a new draft, and the same was read and passed to be engrossed as taken into the new draft further amended. sent down for concurrence.
  
[Right margin: Petition of Charles Ramsdell]
+
[Petition of Charles Ramsdell]
 
 
 
Petition of Charles Ramsdell that the Legislature may examine into the facts of a suit pending between him and the State came
 
Petition of Charles Ramsdell that the Legislature may examine into the facts of a suit pending between him and the State came

Latest revision as of 16:03, 23 July 2020

143

[1827.]

[Legislature.] Legislature might have a recess on Tuesday the 20th day of February instant and the same was read, amended by striking “Tuesday, 20th” and inserting “Saturday 17th,” and accepted, Sent down for concurrence Concurred

[Bill respecting toll Bridges.] Bill respecting toll Bridges was read a second time and passed to be engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence.

Adjourned

Afternoon,

[Resolve establishing the Seat of Government.] Resolve establishing the seat of Government came up amended and the Senate reconsidered their former vote so far as to adopt the amendments proposed by the House and the question “shall this Resolve now pass to be engrossed as amended in concurrence with the House ordered to be taken by yeas and nays was decided in the affirmative as follows

[Yeas.] Yeas Messrs. Dennett, Sweat, Kimball, Southwick, Williams, Francis, Grover, Washburn, Weston and Butman, (Ten)

[Nays.] Nays Messrs. Dunlap, Churchill, Dunn, Stebbins, Parsons, Elwell, Gardner, Hathaway and Balkam (Nine)

[Bill add. respecting the passg. of fish in the seven mile Brook in V.] Bill additional respecting the “passing of fish in the seven mile Brook in Vassalborough was read a second time and passed to be engrossed. sent down for concurrence

[Report. Resolve in favor of the town of Calais.] Mr. Balkam from the Committee reported Resolve in favor of the town of Calais as by the House taken into a new draft, and the same was read and passed to be engrossed as taken into the new draft further amended. sent down for concurrence.

[Petition of Charles Ramsdell] Petition of Charles Ramsdell that the Legislature may examine into the facts of a suit pending between him and the State came