Difference between revisions of ".MTczMg.MTkxNjA"
m (Protected ".MTczMg.MTkxNjA" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
42 | 42 | ||
− | [ | + | [Order of H.R. |
− | Order of H.R. | + | expediency of allowing Law for the |
− | expediency of | ||
− | |||
regulation of Inn | regulation of Inn | ||
− | holders, Retailers | + | holders, Retailers &c] |
− | + | ||
into the expediency of so altering or amending the existing Law | into the expediency of so altering or amending the existing Law | ||
for the regulation of Innholders, Retailers and Victuallers, that | for the regulation of Innholders, Retailers and Victuallers, that | ||
Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
bill or otherwise. | bill or otherwise. | ||
− | [ | + | [Order from H.R. |
− | Order from H.R. | ||
expediency of passing | expediency of passing | ||
a Law authorizing | a Law authorizing | ||
Judges of Probate | Judges of Probate | ||
− | to appoint Guardians | + | to appoint Guardians] |
+ | |||
" That the committee on the Judiciary be directed to inquire | " That the committee on the Judiciary be directed to inquire | ||
into the expediency of passing a Law authorizing Judges of Pro- | into the expediency of passing a Law authorizing Judges of Pro- | ||
Line 27: | Line 25: | ||
in concurrence. | in concurrence. | ||
− | [ | + | [Communications |
− | Communications | ||
from Counsellors elect | from Counsellors elect | ||
− | signifying their | + | signifying their acceptance] |
− | + | ||
− | |||
Communications from Daniel Wood, Josiah Dunn Junr, | Communications from Daniel Wood, Josiah Dunn Junr, | ||
Jonathan Thayer and Edward Fuller Esq. Counsellors elect | Jonathan Thayer and Edward Fuller Esq. Counsellors elect | ||
signifying their acceptance were received, read and sent down. | signifying their acceptance were received, read and sent down. | ||
− | [ | + | [Message to the |
− | Message to the | ||
House proposing a | House proposing a | ||
− | Con. to qualify Couns. | + | Con. to qualify Couns.] |
− | + | ||
On motion by Mr Sweat a message was sent to the House | On motion by Mr Sweat a message was sent to the House | ||
of Representatives proposing a Convention forthwith for the | of Representatives proposing a Convention forthwith for the | ||
purpose of qualifying Counsellors elect. concurred. | purpose of qualifying Counsellors elect. concurred. | ||
− | [ | + | [Counsellors qualified] |
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Agreeably to assignment the two Houses met in convention | Agreeably to assignment the two Houses met in convention | ||
when Daniel Wood, Jonathan Thayer, Josiah Dunn Junr | when Daniel Wood, Jonathan Thayer, Josiah Dunn Junr | ||
and Edward Fuller Esqs, came in and before the President | and Edward Fuller Esqs, came in and before the President | ||
of the Senate in presence of both Houses of the Legislature took | of the Senate in presence of both Houses of the Legislature took | ||
− | and subscribed the oaths required by the Constitution to | + | and subscribed the oaths required by the Constitution to qualify them to enter upon the discharge of their official duties |
− | |||
as Counsellors of State. | as Counsellors of State. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In Senate | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Message to Govr | ||
+ | informing of the | ||
+ | qualification of | ||
+ | Counsellors] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr Dennett was charged with a message to the Governor | ||
+ | informing of the qualification of Daniel Wood, Jonathan Thayer, Josiah Dunn Jun and Edward Fuller, Esqs who | ||
+ | had previously been elected Counsellors for the current year |
Latest revision as of 19:12, 29 October 2020
42 [Order of H.R. expediency of allowing Law for the regulation of Inn holders, Retailers &c]
into the expediency of so altering or amending the existing Law for the regulation of Innholders, Retailers and Victuallers, that it may be lawful for all persons to retail beer, ale and cider in less quantities than twenty eight gallons, with leave to report by bill or otherwise.
[Order from H.R. expediency of passing a Law authorizing Judges of Probate to appoint Guardians]
" That the committee on the Judiciary be directed to inquire into the expediency of passing a Law authorizing Judges of Pro- bate in this State to appoint guardians to married women in certain cases, where their husbands have absconded and gone out of the State without making provision for their support and report by bill or otherwise were severally read and passed in concurrence.
[Communications from Counsellors elect signifying their acceptance]
Communications from Daniel Wood, Josiah Dunn Junr, Jonathan Thayer and Edward Fuller Esq. Counsellors elect signifying their acceptance were received, read and sent down.
[Message to the House proposing a Con. to qualify Couns.]
On motion by Mr Sweat a message was sent to the House of Representatives proposing a Convention forthwith for the purpose of qualifying Counsellors elect. concurred.
[Counsellors qualified]
Agreeably to assignment the two Houses met in convention when Daniel Wood, Jonathan Thayer, Josiah Dunn Junr and Edward Fuller Esqs, came in and before the President of the Senate in presence of both Houses of the Legislature took and subscribed the oaths required by the Constitution to qualify them to enter upon the discharge of their official duties as Counsellors of State.
In Senate
[Message to Govr informing of the qualification of Counsellors]
Mr Dennett was charged with a message to the Governor informing of the qualification of Daniel Wood, Jonathan Thayer, Josiah Dunn Jun and Edward Fuller, Esqs who had previously been elected Counsellors for the current year