Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mg.MjA5MjE"
(Created page with "(251) [goods &c from attachment] certain goods and chattels from Attachement, Execution and Distress" again came up, the House insisting on their former vote whereby they pass...") |
m (Protected ".MTc4Mg.MjA5MjE" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(251) | (251) | ||
[goods &c from attachment] | [goods &c from attachment] | ||
| − | certain goods and chattels from | + | certain goods and chattels from Attachment, Execution and Distress" again came up, the House insisting on their former vote whereby they passed the same to be Engrossed. The Senate receded from their former vote whereby they refused the same a passage and passed the same to be Engrossed, in concurrence. |
[Bills Innholders Retailers &c] | [Bills Innholders Retailers &c] | ||
Mr. Megquier, from the Select Committee to whom were referred the Two several Bills relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers and the accompanying papers, reported the Bill entitled "An additional act respecting Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers" with amendments and they further reported that the other ought not to pass. The Senate agreed to the amendments proposed by the committee and the said Bill then passed to be Engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence. So much of the report of said Committee as relates to the Bill entitled "An act relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers", to wit, that the same ought not to pass, was accepted, and the same Bill was refused passage. | Mr. Megquier, from the Select Committee to whom were referred the Two several Bills relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers and the accompanying papers, reported the Bill entitled "An additional act respecting Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers" with amendments and they further reported that the other ought not to pass. The Senate agreed to the amendments proposed by the committee and the said Bill then passed to be Engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence. So much of the report of said Committee as relates to the Bill entitled "An act relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers", to wit, that the same ought not to pass, was accepted, and the same Bill was refused passage. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[Resolve. State valuation] | [Resolve. State valuation] | ||
| − | The Resolve entitled "Resolve for the appointment of a valuation on the several Towns and Plantations in this State" came up indefinitely postponed, for concurrence | + | The Resolve entitled "Resolve for the appointment of a valuation on the several Towns and Plantations in this State" came up indefinitely postponed, for concurrence. The Senate nonconcurred the House in their proposition and adhered to their former vote whereby they passed the |
Latest revision as of 01:03, 3 March 2021
(251) [goods &c from attachment] certain goods and chattels from Attachment, Execution and Distress" again came up, the House insisting on their former vote whereby they passed the same to be Engrossed. The Senate receded from their former vote whereby they refused the same a passage and passed the same to be Engrossed, in concurrence. [Bills Innholders Retailers &c] Mr. Megquier, from the Select Committee to whom were referred the Two several Bills relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers and the accompanying papers, reported the Bill entitled "An additional act respecting Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers" with amendments and they further reported that the other ought not to pass. The Senate agreed to the amendments proposed by the committee and the said Bill then passed to be Engrossed as amended. Sent down for concurrence. So much of the report of said Committee as relates to the Bill entitled "An act relating to Innholders, Retailers and Common Victuallers", to wit, that the same ought not to pass, was accepted, and the same Bill was refused passage. [Resolve. accts. against State] The Resolve entitled "Resolve for the payment of accounts against the state" was read the second time and was, on motion, ordered to lie on the table.
On motion by Mr. Phelps, Ordered, that when the Senate adjourn, they adjourn to three o'clock this afternoon.
[Resolve. State valuation] The Resolve entitled "Resolve for the appointment of a valuation on the several Towns and Plantations in this State" came up indefinitely postponed, for concurrence. The Senate nonconcurred the House in their proposition and adhered to their former vote whereby they passed the