Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mw.MjEyMDY"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "125 Thursday February 3. 1831 Met according to adjournment An order was moved by Mr Holden of Brunswick requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court...")
 
m (Protected ".MTc4Mw.MjEyMDY" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
125
 
125
  
Thursday February 3. 1831
+
Thursday February 3. 1831.
  
Met according to adjournment
+
Met according to adjournment.
  
An order was moved by Mr Holden of Brunswick requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court in regard to certain questions in said Order proposed - and it was moved to postpone the order indefinitely and the question upon the indefinite postponement thereof was taken by yeas and nays as follows - Yeas 82 Nays 64 - and Mr Herrick of Lewiston gave notice that he should move tomorrow for a reconsideration of this question.
+
An Order was moved by Mr. Holden of Brunswick requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court in regard to certain questions in said Order proposed - and it was moved to postpone the order indefinitely - and the question upon the indefinite postponement thereof was taken by yeas and nays as follows - Yeas 82 Nays 64 - and Mr. Herrick of Lewiston gave notice that he should move tomorrow for a reconsideration of this question.
(For yeas and nays see page 522)
+
 
Bill making valid the acts and Resolves passed by the Legislature of the year Eighteen hundred and thirty and for other purposes was taken up and considered and it was successively moved by the following members to postpone the further consideration thereof to the following days - to wit by Mr Hoyt of Readfield to the 4th of April next by Mr Russell of New Sharon to the 4th of March next by Mr Read of Phipsburg to the 20th of March next by Mr Folsom of Eastport to the 23rd instant by Mr Magoun of bath to the 22nd instant by Mr Frost of Topsham to the 21st instant by Mr Holden of Brunswick to the 19th instant by by Mr Tibbets of Lisbon to the 18th instant by Mr Dummer of Hallowell to the 17th instant by Mr Barnard of Alna to the 14th instant and by Mr Boutelle of Waterville to the 10th instant - and the several questions upon postponing the further consideration of said Bill to the several days aforesaid were severally taken by yeas and nays as follows to wit - upon postponing to the 4th of April next Yeas 46 nays 93 - to the 20th of March next yeas 40. Nays 94. to the 4th of March next
+
(For yeas & nays see page 522)
 +
 
 +
Bill - making valid the Acts and Resolves passed by the Legislature of the year Eighteen hundred and thirty and for other purposes - was taken up and considered - and it was successively moved by the following members to postpone the further consideration thereof to the following days - to wit - by Mr. Hoyt of Readfield to the 4.th. of April next by Mr. Russell of New Sharon to the 4.th. of March next - by Mr. Read of Phipsburg to the 20.th of March next - by Mr. Folsom of Eastport to the 23.rd. instant by Mr. Magoun of Bath to the 22.nd. instant - by Mr. Frost of Topsham to the 21.st. instant - by Mr. Holden of Brunswick to the 19.th. instant - by by Mr. Tibbets of Lisbon to the 18.th. instant - by Mr. Dummer of Hallowell to the 17.th. instant - by Mr. Barnard of Alna to the 14.th. instant - by Mr. Shapleigh of Berwick to the 12.th. instant - and by Mr. Boutelle of Waterville to the 10.th. instant - and the several questions upon postponing the further consideration of said Bill to the several days aforesaid were severally taken by yeas and nays as follows to wit - upon postponing to the 4.th. of April next Yeas 46 nays 93 - to the 20.th. of March next yeas 40. Nays 94. - to the 4.th. of March next

Latest revision as of 16:00, 25 January 2021

125

Thursday February 3. 1831.

Met according to adjournment.

An Order was moved by Mr. Holden of Brunswick requesting the opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court in regard to certain questions in said Order proposed - and it was moved to postpone the order indefinitely - and the question upon the indefinite postponement thereof was taken by yeas and nays as follows - Yeas 82 Nays 64 - and Mr. Herrick of Lewiston gave notice that he should move tomorrow for a reconsideration of this question.

(For yeas & nays see page 522)

Bill - making valid the Acts and Resolves passed by the Legislature of the year Eighteen hundred and thirty and for other purposes - was taken up and considered - and it was successively moved by the following members to postpone the further consideration thereof to the following days - to wit - by Mr. Hoyt of Readfield to the 4.th. of April next by Mr. Russell of New Sharon to the 4.th. of March next - by Mr. Read of Phipsburg to the 20.th of March next - by Mr. Folsom of Eastport to the 23.rd. instant by Mr. Magoun of Bath to the 22.nd. instant - by Mr. Frost of Topsham to the 21.st. instant - by Mr. Holden of Brunswick to the 19.th. instant - by by Mr. Tibbets of Lisbon to the 18.th. instant - by Mr. Dummer of Hallowell to the 17.th. instant - by Mr. Barnard of Alna to the 14.th. instant - by Mr. Shapleigh of Berwick to the 12.th. instant - and by Mr. Boutelle of Waterville to the 10.th. instant - and the several questions upon postponing the further consideration of said Bill to the several days aforesaid were severally taken by yeas and nays as follows to wit - upon postponing to the 4.th. of April next Yeas 46 nays 93 - to the 20.th. of March next yeas 40. Nays 94. - to the 4.th. of March next