Difference between revisions of ".MTc4NA.MjE5Njk"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected ".MTc4NA.MjE5Njk" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
302
+
302.
[Yeas]
+
 
Yeas Messrs. Davee, Dole, Dunlap, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Ingalls, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat - 12.
+
[Yeas.]
[Nays]
+
Yeas.
Nays Messrs. Drummond, Fuller, Gardner, Hutchings and Kingsbury - 5.
+
Messrs. Davee, Dole, Dunlap, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Ingalls, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat 12
 +
 
 +
[Nays.]
 +
Nays.
 +
Messrs. Drummond, Fuller, Gardner, Hutchings and Kingsbery  5
 
The Senate then reconsidered the vote whereby said Bill was passed to be engrossed.
 
The Senate then reconsidered the vote whereby said Bill was passed to be engrossed.
Mr. Megquier then moved to amend said Bill by striking out all after the word "made" in the twenty-second section, which question being ordered to be taken by yeas and nays, was decided in the affirmative as follows - to wit:
+
 
[Yeas]
+
Mr. Megquier then moved to amend said Bill by striking out all after the word "made" in the twenty second section, which question being ordered to be taken by yeas and nays, was decided in the affirmative as follows - To wit:
Yeas - Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Hinds, Kingsbury, Megquier, Pike and Sweat - 13.
+
 
[Nays]
+
[Yeas.]
Nays - Messrs. Fuller, Goodwin, Hutchinson and Steele - 4.
+
Yeas.
[Amendment proposed]
+
Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Hinds, Kingsbery, Megquier, Pike and Sweat 13
The same gentleman moved to further amend the said Bill by striking out the words "five years" in the last proviso of the twenty-eighth section and inserting  in lieu thereof the words "one year" on which question the yeas and nays were ordered and the question was decided in the affirmative, as follows, to wit"
+
 
 +
[Nays.]
 +
Nays.
 +
Messrs. Fuller, Goodwin, Hutchinson and Steele 4
 +
 
 +
[Amendment proposed.]
 +
The same Gentleman moved to further amend the said Bill, by striking out the words "two years" in the last proviso of the twenty eighth section, and inserting  in lieu thereof, the words "one year" on which question the yeas and nays were ordered, and the question was decided in the affirmative, as follows, to wit:
 +
 
 
[Yeas]
 
[Yeas]
Yeas - Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Kingsbury, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat - 14
+
Yeas.
 +
Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Kingsbery, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat - 14
 +
 
 
[Nays]
 
[Nays]
Nays - Mr. Fuller - 1.
+
Nay
 +
Mr. Fuller 1

Latest revision as of 12:45, 23 February 2021

302.

[Yeas.] Yeas. Messrs. Davee, Dole, Dunlap, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Ingalls, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat 12

[Nays.] Nays. Messrs. Drummond, Fuller, Gardner, Hutchings and Kingsbery 5 The Senate then reconsidered the vote whereby said Bill was passed to be engrossed.

Mr. Megquier then moved to amend said Bill by striking out all after the word "made" in the twenty second section, which question being ordered to be taken by yeas and nays, was decided in the affirmative as follows - To wit:

[Yeas.] Yeas. Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Hinds, Kingsbery, Megquier, Pike and Sweat 13

[Nays.] Nays. Messrs. Fuller, Goodwin, Hutchinson and Steele 4

[Amendment proposed.] The same Gentleman moved to further amend the said Bill, by striking out the words "two years" in the last proviso of the twenty eighth section, and inserting in lieu thereof, the words "one year" on which question the yeas and nays were ordered, and the question was decided in the affirmative, as follows, to wit:

[Yeas] Yeas. Messrs. Davee, Dole, Drummond, Dunlap, Gardner, Goodwin, Hall, Harding, Hutchings, Kingsbery, Megquier, Pike, Steele and Sweat - 14

[Nays] Nay Mr. Fuller 1