Difference between revisions of ".MTc4Mg.MjA5Mzc"
m (Protected ".MTc4Mg.MjA5Mzc" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
|
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 01:18, 3 March 2021
(267) Resolve. accts. v. State] A Resolve entitled "Resolve rescinding part of the Resolve for the payment of accounts against the State", passed March 6th 1829 was read the first and second times and passed to be Engrossed. Sent down for concurrence. Concurred. [Resolve - pay Chaplains] A Resolve entitled "Resolve providing compensation to the Chaplains of the Legislature" came up, having passed the House to be Engrossed, for concurrence. The said Resolve was read the first and second times, amended and passed to be Engrossed as thus amended. Sent down for concurrence. Concurred. [Bill. Argyle] Mr. Davee, from the Committee of Conference on the part of the Senate, on the subject of the disagreement between the two Houses in relation to the Bill entitled "An act to incorporate the Town of Argyle", made a report which was accepted. Thereupon the Senate refused to recede from their former vote whereby they passed said Bill to be Engrossed. The House refused to recede from their former vote and the said Bill was rejected, by reason of said disagreement. [Resolve in favor of B. Dunn] A Resolve from the House entitled "Resolve in favor of Benjamin Dunn" came up, having passed the House to be Engrossed, for concurrence. The said Resolve was read the first time and this afternoon at three o'clock was assigned for the second reading: and in the mean time the said Resolve was committed to Messrs. Hinds, Gardner and Hutchinson. [Bills passed to be enacted] The Committee on Engrossed Bills reported the following Bills to be truly copied from the originals; vis: "An act to regulate the taking of Fish in Tunk River". "An act requiring a Bond from the Secretary of State ". and the same passed to be Enacted, in concurrence. The same Committee reported the following Resolves to be truly copied from the originals; viz: