Difference between revisions of ".MTgzNQ.MjMxMTk"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected ".MTgzNQ.MjMxMTk" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 19:02, 8 March 2021

16

In the returns from the several towns of Atkinson, Cherryfield, Hartland, Islesboro and Readfield, it is slated that the votes were received, sorted, counted and declared, "in the presence of the Town Clerk, who formed a list of the persons voted for, and made a record thereof," and the return is attested by a person as "Town Clerk, pro tem." - The votes were counted. By the return from Howland, it appears that votes were received in that town from inhabitants of the unincorporated place, No 1, old Indian Purchase; - by the return from Lincoln that votes were received, in that town, from inhabitants of three unincorporated places, adjourning said town on the east, south and west; - by the returns from Kilmarnock, that votes were received in that town, from inhabitants of the unincorporated place, called No 2; - by the returns from Houlton, that votes were received in that town, from inhabitants of the Plantation of Foxcroft, Linneus, Wellington, and No. 10 unincorporated places; - by the returns from Franklin, that votes were received, in that town, by inhabitants of an, unincorporated place, called No 15; - and by the return from Mount Desert, that a vote was received, in that town, from an inhabitant of an unincorporated place, called Long Island; - all which votes from said incorporated places were counted. By a return from Blanchard, it appears, that votes were received, in that town, from inhabitants of the unincorporated places, called No 3 in the 4th range, and No 9. in the 9th range. In the body of the return, the name of the town, in which the meeting was holden, and the time, whom it was holden, are not stated; but it is attested on the inside by the Selectmen and Town Clerk of Blanchard