Difference between revisions of ".MTUyOA.MTI0NDQ"

From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Cumberland  
 
Cumberland  
  
Zachariah Leach  
+
Zecheriah Leach  
 
Theodore Mussey  
 
Theodore Mussey  
 
Cyrus Libby  
 
Cyrus Libby  
Line 30: Line 30:
 
Mr Parsons moved a reconsideration of the preceding vote - but the motion was lost 41 pro. 47. con.  
 
Mr Parsons moved a reconsideration of the preceding vote - but the motion was lost 41 pro. 47. con.  
  
[Opinion of Judges Miller & Prebble on the subject of relative increase]  
+
[Opinions of Judges Mellen & Prebble on the subject of relative increase]  
  
On motion of Samuel Redington Esq
+
On motion of Samuel Redington Esqr
 
Ordered, that the opinion of the Supreme Juridical Court of this State on the constitutional question submitted to them relating to the apportionment of Representation be entered at length on the Journals of the House.  
 
Ordered, that the opinion of the Supreme Juridical Court of this State on the constitutional question submitted to them relating to the apportionment of Representation be entered at length on the Journals of the House.  
  
The opinion is as follows.
+
The Opinion is as follows.
  
To the Speaker of the Hon ble House of Representatives of the State of Maine,  
+
To the Speaker of the Honble House of Representatives of the State of Maine,  
  
 
Sir  
 
Sir  
 
An order of the House
 
An order of the House

Revision as of 18:46, 3 April 2020

513

Cumberland

Zecheriah Leach Theodore Mussey Cyrus Libby

Lincoln

Samuel Tucker John McKown Ebenr D Robinson Ephraim Rollins Moses Burley Parker McCobb Joel Miller Nathl Batchelder Isaac G Reed Ebenezer Delano

Oxford

Walter P Carpenter

Nays. 38.

[motion for reconsideration]

Mr Parsons moved a reconsideration of the preceding vote - but the motion was lost 41 pro. 47. con.

[Opinions of Judges Mellen & Prebble on the subject of relative increase]

On motion of Samuel Redington Esqr Ordered, that the opinion of the Supreme Juridical Court of this State on the constitutional question submitted to them relating to the apportionment of Representation be entered at length on the Journals of the House.

The Opinion is as follows.

To the Speaker of the Honble House of Representatives of the State of Maine,

Sir An order of the House