Difference between revisions of ".MTU1Nw.MTcyNzE"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
Electricbug (talk | contribs) (Created page with " Bangor, May 16th[superscript] 1861 st John L Hodsdon Esq. Adjutant & Acting...") |
Electricbug (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
were uniformly well made of a good | were uniformly well made of a good | ||
substantial Cloth. | substantial Cloth. | ||
| + | The Cotton Flannel Drawers were (excepting | ||
| + | a few Doz rejected) of good quality of Cloth | ||
| + | and well made. | ||
| + | The Cotton Flannel Shirts were not good rejected[underscored] | ||
| + | Wollen Socks were (with a few exceptions | ||
| + | which were thrown out) unusually good | ||
| + | All of the above articles were furnished | ||
| + | by Wheelwright & Clark of Bangor | ||
| + | The Knapsacks, Haversacks, Cartridge Boxes | ||
| + | Over | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 2 April 2020
Bangor, May 16th[superscript] 1861
st
John L Hodsdon Esq.
Adjutant & Acting D[?], M, Genl.
In obedience to the order
of the Commander in Chief of the 7th[superscript] inst[?] I have attended to the inspection of the Clothing & Equipment made for the 2d[superscript] Regt and would report as follows: The Overcoats, Frock Coats, Wollen Pants were uniformly well made of a good substantial Cloth. The Cotton Flannel Drawers were (excepting a few Doz rejected) of good quality of Cloth and well made. The Cotton Flannel Shirts were not good rejected[underscored] Wollen Socks were (with a few exceptions which were thrown out) unusually good All of the above articles were furnished by Wheelwright & Clark of Bangor The Knapsacks, Haversacks, Cartridge Boxes
Over