Difference between revisions of ".MTU0MA.MTUzMzE"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec] | [Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec] | ||
The Committee appointed to consider the expediency of establishing by law an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec - reported a "Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of "Kennebec" which was read a first time and tomorrow at ten o'clock assigned for a second reading. | The Committee appointed to consider the expediency of establishing by law an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec - reported a "Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of "Kennebec" which was read a first time and tomorrow at ten o'clock assigned for a second reading. | ||
+ | [Resolve in favor of Nath Tilton] | ||
+ | A Resolve in favour of Nathaniel Tilton read and passed to be engrossed in the House, came up for concurrence - read a first time and tomorrow at 10 oclock assigned for a second reading- | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Pet. James Lord et als] | ||
+ | On motion of Mr. Dunn - the petition of James Lord and others was ordered to be taken from the files of the Senate, and laid on the table - referred to the Joint Standing Committee on New Trials - and sent down for concurrence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Report on Sundry petitions] |
Revision as of 15:52, 3 April 2020
57 [1823 January 8th]
[Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec] The Committee appointed to consider the expediency of establishing by law an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of Kennebec - reported a "Bill establishing an additional term of the Court of Sessions in the County of "Kennebec" which was read a first time and tomorrow at ten o'clock assigned for a second reading. [Resolve in favor of Nath Tilton] A Resolve in favour of Nathaniel Tilton read and passed to be engrossed in the House, came up for concurrence - read a first time and tomorrow at 10 oclock assigned for a second reading-
[Pet. James Lord et als] On motion of Mr. Dunn - the petition of James Lord and others was ordered to be taken from the files of the Senate, and laid on the table - referred to the Joint Standing Committee on New Trials - and sent down for concurrence.
[Report on Sundry petitions]