Difference between revisions of ".MjAwMA.MjUxNDQ"
(Created page with "Sent Bangor July 26, 1864 General-- Andrew J. getchell [Pic?--] Co--"G" [ ] ["H?"] 2nd Regt Me Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull Run July 21/61--disch.d June 30/62 after bei...") |
HeatherMoran (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sent | Sent | ||
| + | |||
Bangor July 26, 1864 | Bangor July 26, 1864 | ||
General-- | General-- | ||
| − | Andrew J. | + | |
| − | Co--" | + | Andrew J. Getchell |
| + | Co--"I" 2nd Regt Me | ||
Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull | Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull | ||
| − | Run July 21/61--disch | + | Run July 21/61--disch'd June 30/62 |
after being 10 ms a prisoner-- | after being 10 ms a prisoner-- | ||
He applied for the | He applied for the | ||
| − | + | $100 Bounty under act March [ ]/63 | |
as having been discharged by reason of | as having been discharged by reason of | ||
wounds record in Battle, he is clearly | wounds record in Battle, he is clearly | ||
| − | + | entitled-- | |
The case having been referred to | The case having been referred to | ||
| − | the | + | the Adjt Gen. office Washington-- |
| − | + | was reported as follows-- | |
| − | "No evidence | + | "No evidence on file |
| − | for what | + | for what town the soldier was discharged. |
| − | + | The c[?] was then returned to me to | |
furnish the evidence. | furnish the evidence. | ||
I sent the affidavit of his | I sent the affidavit of his | ||
| − | Capt. | + | Capt. Gurnsey and Col Roberts, [?] to |
| − | [ ] point--They say | + | [?] point--They say Getchell was a |
| − | + | [?] Co. "H" 2nd ME --Getchells discharge | |
| − | again return the | + | calls him of Co. "G" - they again return the papers to me with the |
| − | + | following endorsement, "Respectfully returned The | |
| − | + | evidence is insufficient in that the affidavit states, | |
| + | |||
over | over | ||
Revision as of 13:20, 29 October 2021
Sent
Bangor July 26, 1864 General--
Andrew J. Getchell Co--"I" 2nd Regt Me Vols was wounded in 1st Battle Bull Run July 21/61--disch'd June 30/62 after being 10 ms a prisoner-- He applied for the $100 Bounty under act March [ ]/63 as having been discharged by reason of wounds record in Battle, he is clearly entitled-- The case having been referred to the Adjt Gen. office Washington-- was reported as follows-- "No evidence on file for what town the soldier was discharged. The c[?] was then returned to me to furnish the evidence. I sent the affidavit of his Capt. Gurnsey and Col Roberts, [?] to [?] point--They say Getchell was a [?] Co. "H" 2nd ME --Getchells discharge calls him of Co. "G" - they again return the papers to me with the following endorsement, "Respectfully returned The evidence is insufficient in that the affidavit states,
over