Difference between revisions of ".ODkw.NTE2Ng"
From DigitalMaine Transcription Project
(Created page with "�") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Dear Mrs. Eckstrom, | |
| + | The pros [underlined] and cons [underlined] have been passing so rapidly that continuity has been mixed. I wrote the enclosed letter before I got your later concession to my "[?]" theory, and I send you, as if nothing had happened, particularly as it calls your attention to an oversight of yours in mixing [?] two rivers. | ||
| + | My very best appreciation for your willingness to see the topographical requisites for grammatical description. | ||
| + | There us no doubt that the [?] runs UP to [?] two miles of the largest mountain (?) in that | ||
Revision as of 01:56, 4 October 2017
Dear Mrs. Eckstrom, The pros [underlined] and cons [underlined] have been passing so rapidly that continuity has been mixed. I wrote the enclosed letter before I got your later concession to my "[?]" theory, and I send you, as if nothing had happened, particularly as it calls your attention to an oversight of yours in mixing [?] two rivers. My very best appreciation for your willingness to see the topographical requisites for grammatical description. There us no doubt that the [?] runs UP to [?] two miles of the largest mountain (?) in that