Difference between revisions of ".MTI1OA.NjAxNA"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
688 BOYLSTON STREET | 688 BOYLSTON STREET | ||
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS | BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS | ||
| + | December 27, 1943 | ||
| − | Dear Mrs. Eckstorm: | + | Dear Mrs. Eckstorm : |
| − | |||
I have no good excuse for not having acknowledged before your fascinating speculations [?] regarding Pemaquid [?]. Reasons for my reglekt [?] are many, extreme busyness with the A [?] Training [?] Program, illness in my family, etc. But I do feel deeply apologetic for not having thanked you earlier for your generous sharing of a good deal of "food for thought." Have you seen C.K. Bolton : [?] Terra Nova : the northeast coast of America before 1602? I seem to have missed seeing it somehow but I remember hearing Mr. Bolton read a chapter from his manuscript back nearly ten years ago. It was a section called "The [fishenie of bacalaoo".] [?] Awfully dull to hear, too! But your mention of the close connection of the [Baoques and Portuguese] [?] with our coast in early times brought it back to by mind and I began to wonder whether this Bolton had made a real contribution to our early | I have no good excuse for not having acknowledged before your fascinating speculations [?] regarding Pemaquid [?]. Reasons for my reglekt [?] are many, extreme busyness with the A [?] Training [?] Program, illness in my family, etc. But I do feel deeply apologetic for not having thanked you earlier for your generous sharing of a good deal of "food for thought." Have you seen C.K. Bolton : [?] Terra Nova : the northeast coast of America before 1602? I seem to have missed seeing it somehow but I remember hearing Mr. Bolton read a chapter from his manuscript back nearly ten years ago. It was a section called "The [fishenie of bacalaoo".] [?] Awfully dull to hear, too! But your mention of the close connection of the [Baoques and Portuguese] [?] with our coast in early times brought it back to by mind and I began to wonder whether this Bolton had made a real contribution to our early | ||
history. | history. | ||
Your explanation of the [shell heaps] [?] interested me more than a little. I had never known before that the Indians dried the [oysters] [?] for [preservation] [?] for food. But isn't it possible that a large number of Indians - that is a number within the realm of actual [bestoveal] [?] possibility - might over a period of several centuries or possibly a thousand years, have | Your explanation of the [shell heaps] [?] interested me more than a little. I had never known before that the Indians dried the [oysters] [?] for [preservation] [?] for food. But isn't it possible that a large number of Indians - that is a number within the realm of actual [bestoveal] [?] possibility - might over a period of several centuries or possibly a thousand years, have | ||
Latest revision as of 18:03, 10 May 2018
� BOSTON UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS
688 BOYLSTON STREET
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
December 27, 1943
Dear Mrs. Eckstorm : I have no good excuse for not having acknowledged before your fascinating speculations [?] regarding Pemaquid [?]. Reasons for my reglekt [?] are many, extreme busyness with the A [?] Training [?] Program, illness in my family, etc. But I do feel deeply apologetic for not having thanked you earlier for your generous sharing of a good deal of "food for thought." Have you seen C.K. Bolton : [?] Terra Nova : the northeast coast of America before 1602? I seem to have missed seeing it somehow but I remember hearing Mr. Bolton read a chapter from his manuscript back nearly ten years ago. It was a section called "The [fishenie of bacalaoo".] [?] Awfully dull to hear, too! But your mention of the close connection of the [Baoques and Portuguese] [?] with our coast in early times brought it back to by mind and I began to wonder whether this Bolton had made a real contribution to our early history. Your explanation of the [shell heaps] [?] interested me more than a little. I had never known before that the Indians dried the [oysters] [?] for [preservation] [?] for food. But isn't it possible that a large number of Indians - that is a number within the realm of actual [bestoveal] [?] possibility - might over a period of several centuries or possibly a thousand years, have