.MjEwNg.Mjk0NTk

[page 91] could be here Mr. Pattangill: Was it an explanation of the testimony you gave last week? Dr. Neal: No; I will not repeat at all. I wish to make an explanation before proceeding further. When I attended to Mr. Richards, at that time I had forgotten about it. He was some what unwell, and his wife had come with him to the hospital, and he didnt feel able to attend to any little matter about the food or any thing else. I dont intend to do injustice to any person here or make a wrong statement. I was talking about the food at the time I closed; that the food had been found bad; that I had complained of it and hadn't found that it was properly attended to. Some time after that or during that last year, one of the employes who had charge of the meat was discharged. He was perhaps an inefficient man in that respect, having but one eye that he could see well with, and it having been reported that if he made another mistake he would be discharged. And this was after Mrs. Quimby, I think, had been appointed a member of the trustee board. Mr. Baker: When did you say that was? Dr. Neal: This last financial year, 1880. Mrs. Hall